Tuesday, February 2, 2010

Anti-Arpaio Facebook Group Publishes Map To Sheriff's House

Last week, someone on an anti-Arpaio Facebook group posted a satellite image and a map to Arpaio's Fountain Hills home, Phoenix television station 3TV (KTVK) reported.

From 3TV:

Sheriff Arpaio says threats against him are increasing, and he told his security detail about the posting.

(Devin) Fleenor, however, says he has been deleting references to violence against Arpaio, and he has taken down the map to his house.

This is not the first time one of Arpaio's addresses has been published.

When the Phoenix New Times published a story about Arpaio's land investments in 2004, the publication was hit with a far-reaching subpoena. In 2006, deputies arrested executive Michael Lacey and Jim Larkin after they wrote a story disclosing the contents of the subpoena.

Labels: 3TV, facebook, land deals, new times

208 Comments:

Anonymous said...: I am a middle class, well educated woman who was raised to respect the difficult task of the men & women in law enforcement. However today I lost a lot of that respect, having for the first time since moving to Arizona experienced the intimidation tactics of the MCSO.
A detective with the Sheriff's department cited me for speeding today. I don't deny that I was driving over the speed limit. However he told me numerous times that he was going to arrest me and if I call my husband to let him know I was being arrested, that if he made any trouble he would be arrested too. He did not in fact arrest me. He did however tell me that if I showed up in court to fight the ticket, and wasted taxpayer money (I guess he thought I'm the only person in Maricopa County who doesn't pay taxes) that he would re-cite me and arrest me for felony reckless driving.
I used to think that the bad PR that MCSO gets in the press was due to a few bad apples, Sheriff Joe included. Now I see that this department is drunk with it's own power. I am actually hesitant to put my real name on this post, as I am familiar with the retaliation tactics of Sheriff Joe and his gang. They feel it incumbent upon themselves to intimidate and terrorize the citizens of Maricopa County. It is scary to think that the people of this county continue to vote this man into office every time he is up for re-election.; February 2, 2010 at 6:56 PM
Anonymous said...: I think the sheriff is doing a good job if non-law abidding would let it be and let sheriff Joe try and protect the pulbic!!; February 2, 2010 at 6:59 PM
The real reason you like Joe. said...: Shut up and go cheer lead someplace else deputy!; February 2, 2010 at 8:02 PM
Anonymous said...: How can a 2% (or ANY) increase be justified? Before answering this question - the following questions should be addressed, and given serious consideration.

Q1) How does one become a CHIEF in Phoenix?
(this role does not require moving up through the ranks like all other law enforcement roles)...

Q2) Who Appoints a CHIEF?

Q3) How Many CHIEFS are there in Phoenix?

Q4) How many CHIEFS are in Los Angeles (A much larger city)?

Q5) How much could be saved by cutting down the number of CHIEFS in Phoenix???!!!!

I tell you this... it would sure make up for more than the 2% proposed to be taken out of our pockets.

Get wise people, Joe is a JoKe.; February 2, 2010 at 9:19 PM
Anonymous said...: Sounds like Joe's audience (not constituents, as would ordinarily be the case), is abandoning him. My question: What took so long so see through this transparent publicity hound.

Thanks very much for your post "well educated woman" it seems, unfortunately, to be representative of the MCSO. I feel sorry for the good people there who really want to do a good job of serving and protecting the public and they wind up having to serve Joe's ego or lose their jobs. So how about getting a Sheriff who does his job? Imagine that!

FYI: When you are issued a citation, you are legally (in AZ anyway) under arrest- you are just not normally taken into custody then. I don't know whether this information has any value in your case. Wouldn't it be great if you could get an attorney to represent you?; February 2, 2010 at 9:30 PM
Anonymous said...: I should add that there are snot balls, who are essentially criminals in uniform in every department everywhere of any size.

It's probably a much worse problem when the boss is an unmitigated snot ball!; February 2, 2010 at 9:33 PM
Anonymous said...: I'm pumped that no white supremacists have ruined this thread (yet, anyway) with their ignorant ramblings. They seem to love Arpaio. Makes sense.; February 2, 2010 at 9:35 PM
Mark Gasser said...: To long winded cry baby anonymous,

Your story claiming Joe and his so called gang threatened you. I hate to break it to you, Joe's deputies or no different than the police from all 50 states.

No, police are not trained to be nice, they are trained to take charge of the situation. Your story makes no sense by the way. Admit it, you got mouthy and threatened to call your husband and the officer wouldn't let you reach into your purse for your cell phone right? I thought so. Mess with the California Highway Patrol, if you think Joe's deputies are bad. You would have been arrested in CA.; February 3, 2010 at 4:10 AM
Mark Gasser said...: To ALL arrested Joe bashers,

Boo hoo, to you all. Go cry somewhere else. Don’t like having to show respect when you are pulled over? Don’t, when your mouth ends you up behind bars, then you go leave anonymous messages saying Joe must go. You Joe bashers are all the same, got arrested and got your feelings hurt.

You think the next sheriff is going to retrain all the deputies to kiss your law breaking butts, lol, think again. Joe doesn’t train the police to take charge, they all have the same training in all 50 states. You people that think just Joe’s deputies will put you in your place, all live in a fantasy world.

If you don’t like the laws change them. If you don’t like how American police conduct business, change that too. But blaming Joe for how ALL police are in ALL 50 states behave? Wake up and grow up. If you bashers had a real claim against Joe or his deputies, you would of sued both and you know it. Like most cry baby cries, no attorney would take your cry baby complaint. Attorneys won’t waste their time on bull crap baby cries.; February 3, 2010 at 4:33 AM
Mark Gasser said...: to the jealous basher who posts this,

(FYI: When you are issued a citation, you are legally (in AZ anyway) under arrest- you are just not normally taken into custody then. I don't know whether this information has any value in your case. Wouldn't it be great if you could get an attorney to represent you?)

You are under arrest in any county moron, not just Joe's. Again, if you don't like the law, change it and quit being a jealous cry baby.

NO, no attorney will take her claim moron, she would of hired an attorney already if she had more than a cry. Poor poor jealous basher, no evidence against Joe so you jump on the band wagon of another cry babies. You people are pathetic, to say the least.; February 3, 2010 at 4:49 AM
Mark Gasser said...: Joe retraces smudged boarder,,

In the time of so called terrorist threats to this country, the Federal Government allows modern day slaves to walk right into our country. Bringing with them on their backs, 90 percent of the meth in America.

YES, Mexican made meth is a terrorist attack, using chemical war fare! More Americans die in America from Mexican meth than from eastern terrorist threats in our 2 oil wars.(so called war on terror, to get the majorities support) I support all our poor soldiers, but have zero support for the reason they are dying in war. What about the war on terrorist here? Not only is Mexico killing with meth, now they are kidnapping and raping our women. One a day in Phoenix, plus our young women being ripped from ocean resorts in Mexico, while on spring break. Then taken to the desert and raped to death. Right under the eye’s of the Mexican government.

Mexico took the government from France, and replaced it with an even more repressive government. A government who can’t control it’s drug lords anymore. The drug lords there have better weapons and more money than the Mexican Police. Why? Because their government steals the Mexican majorities money and is controlled by the money of the drug lords. These drug lords are now taking over Mexico completely. France was a cakewalk compared to their new drug lord ran government.

The Federal government has allowed Mexico to move our boarder. They are deported one day and back the next. How can the Feds be stopping a terrorist with hollow boarders? How long will it be, before we start calling them nuke backs?

Joe is doing everything he can to fight the American invasion by Mexico. While the Federal government calls Mexico our best ally? Best for what, modern day slaves? That’s exactly what they mean, when they call Mexico our best ally. Billions of dollars for mega farms in WI and other industries here. “So what if they kill a few Americans with chemical war fare, they are just low lives.” Maybe they won’t feel that way when one of their kids does as all kids, and does something they regret. Meth only takes one mistake to be addicted. On the other hand, I bet these memes Feds wouldn’t care, just consider it an expendable American.

The Federal ran Boarder Patrol, pretends there is nothing wrong with having a southern boarder that allows anyone carrying anything they want, to walk right into America. The boarder patrol regulates how many illegals come in. It is not their job to stop illegals, just ask an illegal. You maybe a bit surprised when one tells you the boarder Patrol brings illegals in. Don’t be, I heard it from illegals before, why would they make that up? They wouldn’t. Yes the Feds want the slaves, Joe is fighting the war on terror here, the Feds are allowing it! Yes the Feds hate Joe, because he retraces the Mexican American boarder, Joe arrests the smudgers. Every sheriff in this country listens to the Feds when they tell them to leave the illegals alone. All but one! Joe has the balls to stand up and fight.; February 3, 2010 at 4:52 AM
Mark Gasser said...: Channel 5 wins more band wagonors and makes more criminals.

It appears your Joe post, have gotten many off their coach to cry about the time Joe’s deputies made them cry. Are you proud of your abusive media power? Yes, you are the reason there are more criminals in our valley. Making threats is against the law, thanks for helping reduce crime like Joe does. Just kidding, you don’t reduce anything criminal, you only promote crime. I know I know, your system ran bosses want the slaves here. Therefore it is ok for you all to make more criminals here. I know I know, your bosses don’t care about human life, money is number one only. Yes, you may of gotten a bunch of coach potatoes to jump on your band wagon. Lucky most of them can’t even vote. You have not hurt Joe, you hurt all of us though, with more crime in our streets. Hitler used the power of media too, but trust me, your bosses are no Hitler. No, you are not going to take down Joe, the only politician with the bulls to stands up to your bosses.; February 3, 2010 at 5:26 AM
Anonymous said...: Well I see that Mark is here once again with his pom-pom's and brown and gold skirt with his typical crap and nonsence. To those who have seen it first hand the complete and utter disrespect the MCSO has perpetrated on its very citizens I encourage you to write the Department of Justice and let them know what happened. With that, also let them have a copy of the citation with the officers name and badge number on it. If enough people will speak out about it they will be back, and sometime they come back and arrest those who have abused their power.

As for that knucklehead Mark, pay no attention to him. He seems to think he know everything about police training and the POST certification process. Just to let you all know, police are not taught to be rude, nor are they taught to be threatening. This can actually backfire on them and get them in trouble. Most of the older cops know the difference and warn the younger ones all the time. If a department approves of this type of intimidation then it is a direct reflection of their leadership, which in these cases does not suprise me with that retard Joe running the office into the ground.

Anyone who receives a response from Mark Gasser just ignore him. He is a coward and a liar to boot with absolutely know clue. For all we know this idiot is probably related to Hendersnott or any one of the SS member within Maricopa County.

Mark, it would probably benefit you to stop playing in the street. You may get hit by another Milk Truck. Just curious, how much did you milk the federal government for you own ridiculas actions. I am looking at some interesting stuff in your so called military record Mark and I think you have some explaining to do. You might want to call St Louis and see if you can get that sealed because the Freedom of Information Act is a wonderful thing.; February 3, 2010 at 6:17 AM
Anonymous said...: Mark:

Freud had a name for comments like this, "Hitler used the power of media too, but trust me, your bosses are no Hitler." Nice, but I think we know where you stand.

You are a coward and a liar.; February 3, 2010 at 6:22 AM
Mark Gasser said...: to the cry baby anonymous who wrote,
(Mark:
Freud had a name for comments like this, "Hitler used the power of media too, but trust me, your bosses are no Hitler." Nice, but I think we know where you stand.
You are a coward and a liar)

One great point you made, yes, even the smartest people in the world at the time, listened and believed the system that Hitler led. Do you believe Hilter was right? I don't, but the majority of Germany was brain washed by the media into believeing Hitler was the coming of God.

It is blind sheep like you who are the cowards. Afraid to stand up to the system, like Joe stands up? Joe has the balls to buck the Hitler like system. Proof you want? Your name, annoymous blind sheep. What more proof does anyone need. Go home and fight, your police are getting their butts kicked. No, Joe's police won't fall to the illegal money system like Mexico's did.; February 3, 2010 at 7:05 AM
Mark Gasser said...: Plenty of work for all but you,

If ALL the sheriffs in this great country, did as Joe and enforced all our laws, unemployment would fall and fall fast.

True enough, not many cared about the jobs the modern day slaves held, before the economy collapsed, except Joe. Some others did care, just not the majority. Some others being, the family farmers who’s farms were sold off to the banks. That are now mega farms ran by the slaves. Yes, Joe fought for these people long before it was a majority issue.

Now, the majority has their eye’s open wider than ever, when it comes to the modern day slaves. Many LEGAL Americans are out of work. Jobs they could and should be doing, are held by the modern day slaves, ILLEGALLY held that is.

The money system that runs most media and all other sheriffs, loves the modern day slaves. Without the slaves, they Federal government could not of cut milk prices in half to put the family farms out of business. To benefit the middle rich men.(milk prices only went up in the stores for the majority) The money that kept the family farm afloat, is now in the hands of the system that depends on the modern day slaves to make them richer.

Yes we have lots of work to be done in America. Once we stop the system that Joe bucks, and eliminate all the modern day slaves. It is time for the united majority of America, to take the power away from the system. When we do, we will have a good America for all that are legally here. With plenty of work for the ones who want it. For all truly good souls, there is only Joe’s ways to follow. Don’t let the media Hitlers brain wash you.

“Follow Joe, to a working legal America! Or follow the money system to hell.”; February 3, 2010 at 7:07 AM
Anonymous said...: Hahahahahah, Mark nice try covering your tracks, but I have you pinpointed. You want to take power away from the system..retart. The people are the power and when the people will get off there ass and force the hand of the Feds and not allow citizens to be treated like illegals then we will have heard the voice of America. Idiots like you support a National Socialist movment where, in your own words, "When we do, we will have a good America." Sounds very familiar to a speech made in 1936. You can hide, but your own words have defined who and what you are. Go zig heil somewhere else, cause we don't want you here.; February 3, 2010 at 7:40 AM
Anonymous said...: Oh and Mark, you already know my name. It's Paul and I gave you the opportunity to learn a little and you have refused to show yourself so too late my friend, I know where you stand and know who you are.; February 3, 2010 at 7:43 AM
Mark Gasser said...: To Brain dead coward who posted this,

(Just curious, how much did you milk the federal government for you own ridiculas actions. I am looking at some interesting stuff in your so called military record Mark and I think you have some explaining to do. You might want to call St Louis and see if you can get that sealed because the Freedom of Information Act is a wonderful thing.)

Man are you a brain dead liar. No need to seal my military records like a coward like you did. I have nothing to hide coward, you do. I received an honorable discharge and never saw a military doctor. How is that milking the feds like you do everyday? If you had half a clue about the military, you would know you can’t sue the military moron. Quit making up lies again and again and again, that is all that comes out of your dry words, dry system farts. Can you step in front of a stray somewhere, for all our benefit? I think that explains all I needed to. The fact you are a lying coward said it all lol.; February 3, 2010 at 7:45 AM
Mark Gasser said...: Words of the coward pauli,

("the Freedom of Information Act is a wonderful thing.")

Yes it is a wonderful thing for a coward like you. How many Afghanistan children did you kill exactly, that is now hid from us? Thanks to your coward hiding, freedom of information act.; February 3, 2010 at 7:54 AM
Mark Gasser said...: To coward pauli

You wrote this lol,
"The people are the power and when the people will get off there ass"

Get off their ass lol. Man get off yours, you are perma farting military property, the chair you planted your dead all while being paid with our taxes. This is where the military tax dollar is going? To idiots like you, to waste our money posting your dry farts. Get a real job, America can't afford military babies that never stop sucking the system's nipple. Brain washed is not you, you are brain dead, to say the least. Not to mention a tax dollar leach. Yes the United Majority of America is the true power of America. Once we take control, you won’t be sucking nipples anymore.; February 3, 2010 at 8:07 AM
Maria said...: I met Sheriff Joe when my son was in jail as a juvenile and he was very genuine and caring to the mothers. I was very impressed. Also, I love the job that he and his dept. do. My mother came here long ago from the Netherlands, and back then people had to come into the country properly, what is different now, people claiming racial profiling is a big joke, I would be more than happy to cooperate if a police officer had to question me because they thought I may be here illegally, to help maintain the borders of OUR COUNTRY! It is a very difficult job, and I will keep voting for you Sheriff Joe!; February 3, 2010 at 8:10 AM
Anonymous said...: Mark,

Do you post your posts, then read them to yourself, whilst masturbating?

Get a girlfriend!; February 3, 2010 at 8:14 AM
Mark Gasser said...: To above anonymous,
Aww, did the fire of the truth burn you? Now you come and show us your real intelligence. Thanks. But I don't think the tax payers appreciate you masturbating on military property.; February 3, 2010 at 8:19 AM
Anonymous said...: “Follow Joe, to a working legal America! Or follow the money system to hell.”; February 3, 2010 at 8:35 AM
Anonymous said...: To Mark Gasser,
I'm the "well educated woman". I hate to burst your self-righteous bubble, but having lived in CA for many years, and I can tell you on the rare occasion that I encountered CHP, I was never treated by them or any police organization the way I was by MCSO yesterday. CHP has this weird policy of mutual respect and inforcing the law without automatically threatening and intimidating everyone they encounter. Did I mention that the detective actually admitted at one point he was out of line??? But he still proceeded to threaten me all the same.
It must be nice to be you Mark. I can't imagine you're anyone important other than being the perfect, law abiding, model citizen that we all should aspire to be. Too bad we can't all be like you... but I guess if we were, you're beloved Sheriff and his hired thugs would be obsolete!; February 3, 2010 at 8:35 AM
Mark Gasser said...: to anonymous who still is crying hard and posted this,

(Did I mention that the detective actually admitted at one point he was out of line??? But he still proceeded to threaten me all the same.)

You sound like every inmate in all jails, "I did nothing wrong."

If you have a real claim of wrongful doing, you could of found an attorney to take your case for free, but you didn’t did you?

Sure you didn't do anything wrong, we all believe you lol. Yes, even CHP can be pricks, when you are acting the fool. No, Joe’s officer wasn't going to let you reach into your purse to grab something or to call your husband. Remember, the law here says you are under arrest, when being sited. No, Joe didn't make that law.

Yes ALL police can be pricks, some without a reason. Joe's officers are no different. You are no different than all the other cry babies who get their peepees whacked by a police officer, in Joe's county or in anyone else’s. A word of advise to you, “Don't act the fool when being pulled over, then you won't have to act the fool here.”; February 3, 2010 at 8:53 AM
Mark Gasser said...: to Mark Gasser,

To all bashers who send me these notes. I don't read most of your rambling same bull crap long notes, but do catch a few words from them. When I do, you will know it, Mark my words.
For the most part, you are wasting your time and only proving how media brain washed you really are. Thanks but no thanks, we don't need brain deads proving their ignorance over and over again. We saw how ignorant you were with the first post you wrote, calling me your childish names. You people need to grow up and quit sucking on the systems nipples.; February 3, 2010 at 9:13 AM
Anonymous said...: I dislike Arpaio and all he stands for just like the now majority in our county. He is a dispicable example of law enforcement.

That being said, it is wrong for anyone to publish the address and/or location of anyone in law enforcement -- even Arpaio's.

He should be driven from office, but it must be done legally -- and it will be done. there is no excuse for retaliating against a tyrant in other than in an upright, legal manner. This country is better than that. There is no reason to lower oneself to the level of an Arpaio and Hendersquat.

We live in the greatest nation in the world and we have legal processes available to us to remove from office any politition who breaks the law and does not respect our people.

Fight him and his goons legally and do not stoop thi his level to get the job done, the feds will take card of him. It also appears that he will lose if another election were to be held today.; February 3, 2010 at 9:24 AM
Mark Gasser said...: To anonymous who wrote this,

(Fight him and his goons legally and do not stoop thi his level to get the job done, the feds will take card of him. It also appears that he will lose if another election were to be held today.)

I agree with a lot of what your post was about. I even believe the women who said she was wrongfully harassed by one of Joe's deputies. But no, I don't hate Joe or think his deputies are worse than the rest of the police here. All the stories told here about Joe's deputies, happen everyday in all of America. I agree police should be respectful, but sadly most are not. I still don't hate any of them for this. It is how the police system works in America. In England, the police treat all with respect, but that might have something to do with the fact that the police over there don't carry guns?

As far as giving out names and maps of police, what is channel 5 trying to do with this post? Let others know that Joe’s house can be found on the internet? Yes the media is a powerful thing, it keeps us blind to the truth too, there greatest power of all. The media makes news out of things that will help their system masters, not what is really important for the majority..

With that said, could you please tell me how Joe and his goons are trying to hurt the majorities interest? Don’t say it is for the same reason the Feds have him in court. Joe apposed the spending of four million on an unneeded new court house, that is why he is in court now with the feds. The officials that got laced from the contractor of the new court house, are claiming Joe used illegal practices to debate the building of the unneeded court house. It for sure will be interesting to see how this turns out.

You say Joe would lose in an election to day, in your words above. Hmm, where did you get the info for this train of thought? Let me guess, the system ran media that wants Joe gone right?; February 3, 2010 at 9:48 AM
Anonymous said...: I'll bet Joe published his own address, or he had someone else publish it so that he can attempt to get a list of IPs on this board. Yet another example of the tactics of the MCSO. Corrupt, mean, and above all nasty.; February 3, 2010 at 9:50 AM
Mark Gasser said...: Sorry,
I made a mistake, Joe is in court for the apposing the spending of four hundred million dollars on the new unneeded court house, not four million like I posted above. Yes the four hundred million would of hired a lot of police. God knows we need them here, so does Joe.; February 3, 2010 at 10:03 AM
Mark Gasser said...: To anonymous who posted this,

(I'll bet Joe published his own address, or he had someone else publish it so that he can attempt to get a list of IPs on this board. Yet another example of the tactics of the MCSO. Corrupt, mean, and above all nasty.)

Do you work for channel 5, or are you really that brain dead?; February 3, 2010 at 10:05 AM
Anonymous said...: Mark is ruining this thread too. His rants, and childish name calling accusing everyone but himself of being blind is a waste. Mark Gasser won't allow his ego to consider that someone else matters. Arpaio will get what he deserves from the legal system.

Mark Gasser will be in another thread then, telling people that they're blind, etc. etc. etc.. You have to wonder why he and other white supremacists love Joe Arpaio so much.

"Do you work for channel 5, or are you really that brain dead?" No the person isn't a brain-dead blind sheep (like Mark Gasser) and his thinking for him/her-self about the tactics of MCSO. Many have see the shenanigans and have become that cynical, Mark, and maybe they're right. Fortunately the address was posted elsewhere so this board should be okay for now.; February 3, 2010 at 10:23 AM
Mark Gasser said...: Words of the media,

(From 3TV:
Sheriff Arpaio says threats against him are increasing, and he told his security detail about the posting.)

We have to ask our self, why this could be? Legal Americans don't do this stuff.

Reason 1) Maybe more illegals know of Joe's plot against the American invasion by Mexico?

Reason 2) Maybe the system it's self is threatening Joe? The system took out King and Kennedy when they had no proof against either. I wonder what they will do when Joe beats them in Federal court?

America can't afford to lose another politician that stands up for the majority, that's for sure.; February 3, 2010 at 10:28 AM
Anonymous said...: And you know this because? Oh, that's right you work for Joe. I'll be the FEDs are watching the boards as well and any requests for ip info.; February 3, 2010 at 10:36 AM
Anonymous said...: "America can't afford to lose another politician that stands up for the majority, that's for sure."

I am sure the majority of Americans are against politicians who abuse their power.; February 3, 2010 at 10:38 AM
Mark Gasser said...: To Rambling system slave who posted this,

("Many have see the shenanigans and have become that cynical,")

Hmm, lets see who you mean by MANY? The so called officials that have Joe in court right now, for trying to stop the waste of four hundred million on an unneeded court house. Is this some of the many you refer too? Or is it the many that break the law, that wish they had not unleashed the power of the MCSO? Or are you referring to the many that money buys in our country. The many that uses modern day slaves to make them richer?

In any case, America is much better off without your many Joe bashers, who want to exploit our laws for money. If you don‘t like what Joe will do when you break ANY law here, don’t unleash the power of the MCSO. You WILL get your peepee whacked for sure, when you do break the law here, Mark my words. Joe is fighting for us the majority, not the system that has no problem with meth backs coming here.; February 3, 2010 at 10:46 AM
Anonymous said...: The reason is simple: Arpaio likes to make it into the news as a sympathetic figure. When a hunter shot (apparently mistaktenly) into the roof of Lou Dobbs New Jersey home on October 29, 2009- Arpaio went on TV claiming that he was concerned that people might also be gunning for him. He never explained just why.

He and Dobbs have this in common: Both have been very vocal about illegal immigration.

Allow me to anticipate a flood of garbage from the white supremacist side: Post some figures on how successful MCSO has been in enforcing federal (before their authorization was yanked for abuses), and state immigration laws. You never have! This means you're blind sheep with no facts to back-up the one things you love about Arpaio.

The only system threatening Joe Arpaio is the legal system. That will happen when you break the law. Just ask Joe Arpaio.; February 3, 2010 at 10:47 AM
Anonymous said...: The only system threatening Joe Arpaio is the legal system. That will happen when you break the law. Just ask Joe Arpaio.

I couldn't agree more. Joe Arpaio is his own worst enemy.; February 3, 2010 at 10:50 AM
Mark Gasser said...: To chicken little who posted this,

(And you know this because? Oh, that's right you work for Joe. I'll bet the FEDs are watching the boards as well and any requests for ip info)

No I don't work for Joe, for the hundredth time. Never met the only politician left who fights for the majority. But would feel honored in his presents.

You may fear the government, but Joe does not. No, your little treat didn't scare me either.; February 3, 2010 at 10:52 AM
Anonymous said...: Nobody wuld want Joe hurt. He's a good man. He take care of us and my wife. Mark is good to. Hi Mark.; February 3, 2010 at 11:03 AM
Mark Gasser said...: to the blind anonymous who wrote,

(Allow me to anticipate a flood of garbage from the white supremacist side: Post some figures on how successful MCSO has been in enforcing federal (before their authorization was yanked for abuses), and state immigration laws. You never have! This means you're blind sheep with no facts to back-up the one things you love about Arpaio.)

You are saying Joe is a white supremacist for arresting illegals? Is that what you really convinced your brain dead brain into believing? Open your eyes! Joe has no problem with the true native Americans, and yes they are black in skin color. Nor does he have a problem with the Native North Americans, and yes they are red in skin color. It’s not about color, it’s about the law! He has a problem with law breakers of any color. Yes, if you come here undocumented, you are breaking the law. True enough, Joe is the only sheriff that enforces this law. That makes Joe more honest than the rest, not a white supremacist dumb ass.

As far as Joe being successful in fighting the system that loves the modern day slaves? If he arrested just one modern day slave for simple being here illegal, he did more than any other sheriff has done. Your words are hollow from the truth and filled with money ideas for the system. Good luck with that, the majority is not a blind sheep, when it comes to the system you so love.; February 3, 2010 at 11:05 AM
Anonymous said...: "the only politician left who fights for the majority" - today's little bit of idiocy to make you smile. So Joe's the majority? Who do you think he's fighting for?

Mark- don't forget to brush your tooth before bed.; February 3, 2010 at 11:13 AM
Mark Gasser said...: To no fact anonymous who wrote this,

"the only politician left who fights for the majority" - today's little bit of idiocy to make you smile. So Joe's the majority? Who do you think he's fighting for?

Mark- don't forget to brush your tooth before bed.

Man are you brain dead and without facts of any kind. No Joe is not the majority dumb ass. Majority-is most of us moron. It is a bit sad to hear though, you don't have any teeth left. I suppose you blaim that on Joe? Hmm, maybe one of his officers did knock your teeth out? Next time, don't unleash the power of the MCSO. No, they are not the push over Mexican police, thank God for that.; February 3, 2010 at 11:21 AM
Anonymous said...: "You are saying Joe is a white supremacist for arresting illegals?" Nope, I am saying- give us the figures (not ones you make you, if you know the difference). But you've never done that. You don't know what you're talking about. You can only repeat what you've seen in your pamphlets. Who's the blind sheep, and who's uninformed? Go look in the mirror, Mark Gasser, white supremacist. When did you decide to be born white??? And learn to speak what you'd call "the official language"- English.

White supremacists love Arpaio. Huh, Mark?; February 3, 2010 at 11:24 AM
Anonymous said...: ICE arrests way more illegals, and nobody is accusing them of being white supremacist. But white supremacists love Joe, idolize him some would say. How many does MCSO arrest? We know ICE is bigger- no need to repeat that yet again. How many for MCSO? Do you know? Do you know how many illegals they have arrested during any period of time? Still waiting for the answer- you who call everyone else a blind sheep. How many?; February 3, 2010 at 11:27 AM
Mark Gasser said...: To brain dead a who posted this lol,

"White supremacists love Arpaio. Huh, Mark?"

Get off your kkk kick, your followers are few. Yes, I know you have a problem with all skin color but brown. No, Joe nor I see color when it comes to people, unlike you.

I gave you the fact you wanted. Again here it is. No, you can not prove it wrong because it is fact! "If Joe arrested even one illegal for being here illegally, he did more than any other sheriff in Amreica." Prove me wrong, name one other sheriff that has arrested an illegal for just being here illegally? YOU CAN'T and you know it!

Yes it is clear you are color blind. All you see is your system loving brown nose.; February 3, 2010 at 11:34 AM
Anonymous said...: Try again fool- I'm a white guy, but my paint job doesn't define (or imprison) me. So show us the numbers! You don't know what you're talking about, admit it! You don't have the guts to admit you don't know what you're talking about.

Since you don't know MCSO performance, there must be another reason you are so pro-Joe. Does he attend your meetings (assuming you yourself can find them).; February 3, 2010 at 11:40 AM
Mark Gasser said...: To brain dead anonymous,

ICE is a federal law agency. Not county like Joe, fact smudger.

YES, you are wrong again. Joe is the only sheriff in America that arrests illegals, just for being illegal. What do you think his sweeps are doing? No, it is not racial profiling, it is arresting law breakers dumb ass. Yes, he has busted many illegals when no other sheriff office has to date. The exact number doesn't matter. What matter is, Joe stands up to the Federal system that allows the meth backs to walk right into our country.; February 3, 2010 at 11:42 AM
Anonymous said...: Junior, you'd be hard-pressed to find a Sheriff anywhere who hasn't arrested at least one illegal immigrant. They're everywhere, you know? And some (not most) commit crimes resulting in arrest. Just like you and your neighbors.

So you think Joe's tough on immigration because he's arrested a single illegal. Brilliant!!!

May I recommend a great book: "The Cat in the Hat" by Dr. Seuss? It's something you could probably understand- or have a four-year old explain it to you.

Thanks for the compliment- when it comes to racism- I am color blind. It's how I was raised, and experience has taught me that it makes sense to overlook the paint job and evaluate people all the same.; February 3, 2010 at 11:46 AM
Anonymous said...: "ICE is a federal law agency. Not county like Joe, fact smudger." Well you got that right. You've proved your powers of comprehension are indeed limited- I never indicated otherwise.

So where are Joe's numbers again? You don't know.; February 3, 2010 at 11:48 AM
Mark Gasser said...: To anonymous who wrote this,

"Try again fool- I'm a white gay,"

Lol, you are an anonymous coward, nothing more. Keep your bedroom smut to your self. We could care less what you put in your mouth.; February 3, 2010 at 11:48 AM
Mark Gasser said...: To anonymous coward who posted this,

"ICE is a federal law agency. Not county like Joe, fact smudger." Well you got that right. You've proved your powers of comprehension are indeed limited- I never indicated otherwise.

So where are Joe's numbers again? You don't know.

The numbers you ask for are insignificant to my point. The fact I have proven, you can not disprove. Again, this is the point at hand.

Joe is the only sheriff in America that has arrested a modern day slave for simple being here illegally. Again, this makes Joe more honest than any sheriff now or before Joe.; February 3, 2010 at 11:57 AM
Anonymous said...: Yes, we know where your mind (loose use of the term) is. That's not what I typed (which anyone can read can see). That's weak.

What again are Joe's arrest numbers for illegals? You bring that up to show what a great Sheriff he is- it's the only issue you can hold up. But when pressed for published figures, you keep desperately changing the subject, like a child. Why is he under investigation by a grand jury? He's your hero. Too sad for you. You can't even honestly quote me. How much credibility do you have? Less than an alley cat! (AND MUCH LESS THAN THAT WITH MY GORGEOUS WIFE. Yes, Mark- I've been married to a very beautiful woman (outside and as a person) for many years. You're desperate! And very sad.

I will post some facts about Joe shortly, lest Mark Gasser with his little hamster brain completely hijack this thread with his made-up nonsense.; February 3, 2010 at 12:01 PM
Anonymous said...: Reported by: Katie Fisher
ABC 15
Oct. 29, 2009 5:24 pm

PHOENIX, AZ -- Officials with the Maricopa County Sheriff's Office say they are closely examining Sheriff Joe Arpaio's security after a recent shooting involving CNN TV host Lou Dobbs.

Dobbs' New Jersey home was shot at three weeks ago and some say the outspoken host may have been the target of pro-illegal immigration activists.

According to MCSO officials, Dobbs went public Thursday, saying the media's portrayal of him as a 'hate monger' is fueling open borders activists to rally against him, now to the degree of attempting to cause his family bodily harm.

MCSO Spokesperson Ryan Lee said the department is concerned for Arpaio's safety considering that both he and Dobbs are extremely vocal and visible on a national level in their beliefs that illegal immigration is a serious crime, worthy of arrest and incarceration.

Fox talk show host Geraldo Rivera said Saturday that Arpaio and Dobbs are the "two most unpopular figures with millions of American Latinos."

Lee also cites the many protests Arpaio's television and newspaper interviews have incited, saying some protesters' signs have even depicted Dobbs and Arpaio as fellow KKK members.

Lt. Aaron Brown, head of the Arpaio's security detail, says that his team is re-examining the current level of security his unit provides the Sheriff and whether or not more security is now warranted.; February 3, 2010 at 12:04 PM
Mark Gasser said...: To deaf and dumb blind anonymous who posted this,

(Why is he under investigation by a grand jury? He's your hero. Too sad for you. You can't even honestly quote me. How much credibility do you have? Less than an alley cat! (AND MUCH LESS THAN THAT WITH MY GORGEOUS WIFE. Yes, Mark- I've been married to a very beautiful woman (outside and as a person) for many years. You're desperate! And very sad.)

Are you completely deaf and blind? You know why Joe is under Federal investigation, from my many post about it. But if you insist, here is the reason again,

The county officials that got laced from the contractor building the four hundred million dollar unneeded new court house, has filed Federal indictments, claiming Joe’s deputies came over at super time to debate the waste of this four hundred million.

NO, they will not succeed in convicting Joe on such silly charges. YES, the feds are desperate to remove Joe, because he bucks the system. Joe stands up to the Federal government that allows meth backs to walk right into America. The feds HATE Joe for that and are desperate to remove the only honest politician we have.; February 3, 2010 at 12:11 PM
Anonymous said...: Why dont peple like Joe? He's good. Dont talk bad about Mark, he is good for Joe. They protect white folk. He's good white. Hi Mark.; February 3, 2010 at 12:12 PM
Mark Gasser said...: Hey media brain washed,

If we wanted to read media brain washing, we can do that. We don't need for you to post their garbage here. We see enough of it already. Take your paper and wipe your brown nose with it, that's about all it is good for.

NO, the media doesn't want Joe. Why, because the four major networks are owned by the same system that wants our farms ran by the modern day slaves. The same system that allows the meth backs to walk right into America. Joe bucks the system. Thanks Joe.; February 3, 2010 at 12:21 PM
Mark Gasser said...: To media brain washed, who posted this,

(Why dont peple like Joe? He's good. Dont talk bad about Mark, he is good for Joe. They protect white folk. He's good white. Hi Mark.)

I nor Joe has a problem with legal Americans of any color. I know I know, you have no evidence against Joe, so you make up crap. Like saying Joe is racial profiling when he arrested a Mexican from Mexico for being here illegal. You people are sad, and you just keep digging. You are digging your own words grave.

Thanks for proving your ignorance and the fact you have nothing on Joe, other than the fact he enforces ALL our laws. Too bad, it you don't like it, don't unleash the power of the MCSO. Go break your laws of Mexico, but don't mess with Joe's county.; February 3, 2010 at 12:29 PM
Anonymous said...: Evidently you made up your own reasons he's being investigate- just like you make up your other facts. You do realize that the reasons are a matter up public record, don't you? Will you be in court when he's tried? See how many witnesses are able to get away with what you're trying to pull here! You can't make up facts in court- it's called perjury. In this setting it's called foolishness.

The people who read this, Mark, are not stupid. They know what is going on, and aren't going to believe your green baloney just because you say. And that little bit of editing you did before would be slander if I didn't choose to be anonymous. Keep proving how desperate you are to keep Joe in office. It's very telling.; February 3, 2010 at 12:30 PM
Anonymous said...: Of note is that Arpaio doesn't cite any facts to support his claims of effectiveness. Just like Mark Gasser.

- - - - - - - - - -
November 15, 2007
Arpaio clarifies KKK remarks
By Dennis Welch
Tribune

Maricopa County Sheriff Joe Arpaio said on national television earlier this week that "it's an honor" to be compared to the Ku Klux Klan.

On Thursday, he clarified what he meant: While it's not an honor to be compared to a Nazi or a Klansman, it is an honor that his critics have stooped to name-calling because he's been so effective in combating illegal immigration.

"What I'm trying to say is it's an honor to enforce the law, so when they blast me it doesn't bother me. It makes them look stupid," he said.

Arpaio appeared on CNN's "Lou Dobbs Tonight" on Monday, and he was asked to respond to critics who question his tactics in enforcing illegal immigration.

"Well, you know, they call you KKK. They did me. I think it's an honor, right? It means we're doing something," Arpaio said, according to transcripts of the show.

After nearly half a day of telephone calls with the Tribune on Thursday, the sheriff's communications staff added it was an "off-the-cuff remark."

However, Rev. Oscar Tillman, the executive director of the local NAACP, said there is no honor in being compared to the KKK and cautioned Arpaio to be more thoughtful with his words in the future.

"I am very disappointed that the sheriff would say something like that," he said. "We don't condone any form of what the KKK stands for. We hope he'll be more careful."

Recently, some groups have accused the sheriff of being a racist, a charge he says is unfair and dismisses as cheap political tactics. Last summer a doctored picture of Arpaio in a Klansman outfit standing in front of a burning cross was circulated on the Internet. Under the picture the caption read: "Found guilty for doing the jobs Nobody wants. Arpaio New Political Career KKK."

Elias Bermudez of Immigrants without Borders received it as an e-mail and then forwarded it on to others saying he agreed with its sentiments, according to published reports.

Arpaio immediately condemned the picture and Bermudez for sending it.; February 3, 2010 at 12:34 PM
Mark Gasser said...: To brain dead who thinks he can scare me and say I have no facts and their is plenty of evidence to convict Joe.

This is your threat lol, ("And that little bit of editing you did before would be slander if I didn't choose to be anonymous. Keep proving how desperate you are to keep Joe in office. It's very telling.")

Please, post your name and the comment you say I edited. I will post my exact words after it. NO, you do not have the law on your side, nor do your words scare me lol.

As far as my facts, you can't prove a single one wrong.

It is clear you KNOW Joe is not going to be convicted, like you pretend he is going to be. If you were really sure of a conviction, you wouldn't be on here slandering Joe. Please, post you name on your Joe slanders, it will be great to see what happens to you when you unleash the power of the MCSO. YOU are the one that will be arrested for slander. You called Joe a white supremacist, that is against the law coward. If it were true, you could post your name, but you know for a FACT, your words are mere lies. I have no problem posting my name to my facts, because they are indeed FACT.; February 3, 2010 at 12:50 PM
Mark Gasser said...: About the media posted above,

Joe more than explained what his statement meant. Now lets hear your explanation for saying he is racial profiling? YOU don't have one, instead you compare Joe to the KKK. The words didn't hurt Joe, he shoved them right down their throat didn't he. I understand how he could say such a thing. He’s sick of defending himself against name calling slave lovers.

Keep digging slave lovers, you got a long dig ahead of you. Joe is for US legal Americans. Not for the no fact name calling illegals and their masters.; February 3, 2010 at 1:02 PM
Anonymous said...: You begin your posts with name calling and decline from there. Are you trying to impress idiots? Nobody else would be impressed with your illogical drivel. If you posted a fact I could probably disprove it- but you haven't posted any. But thanks for the non-challenge.

I don't think you'd know a fact if it came and knocked on your door with a big sign on it. I've seen posts from others saying similar things about you.

I think Joe will be convicted as do many people closer to this and to the justice system than I. Nothing either of us says will change that.

Here's some verifiable info for you from a Pulitzer-prize-nominated series in the East Valley Tribune:

Deputies are failing to meet the county’s standard for response times on life-threatening emergencies. In 2006 and 2007, patrol cars arrived late two-thirds of the time on more than 6,000 of the most serious calls for service.

The sheriff’s “saturation” patrols and “crime suppression/anti-illegal immigration” sweeps in Hispanic neighborhoods are done without any evidence of criminal activity, violating federal regulations intended to prevent racial profiling.

Deputies regularly make traffic stops based only on their suspicion that illegal immigrants are inside vehicles. They figure out probable cause after deciding whom to pull over.; February 3, 2010 at 1:11 PM
Anonymous said...: Mark now I know you are a fraud. You don't sue the Feds, but they would have rated you for something like this if you were ever really on active duty or even in the military. You are free to look up my information any time you like.

To answer your other question of how many kids I supposedly killed in Afghanistan I really don't know because most of them were grown up enough to grab an AK-47 and start shooting at me. I am still here and unfortunately, they are not.

So, how did this milk truck hit you head-on again Mark. You were drunk and crossed the lane?? Anyway, my offer still stands if you want a real education from some professionals who not only were on the border with me, but work it every day. Until then, please eat a mint or something because you have posted more bullshit on this website to smell up a couple of rooms. Or better yet, come up with some solutions to the issue instead of you usual vomit and crazy rants.

Goodby and goodluck, let Mickey, Goofy and Donald know I said hello.; February 3, 2010 at 1:12 PM
Anonymous said...: "name calling slave lovers"? You accuse others of calling names? That's a laugh.

Tell us where you got the information that anyone is a slave lover. Again: Say where you GOT it! No need to call anyone names. Just tell us your unimpeachable source(s) of reliable information.; February 3, 2010 at 1:14 PM
Mark Gasser said...: .
To dry brain dead who wrote this,

(Tell us where you got the information that anyone is a slave lover. Again: Say where you GOT it! No need to call anyone names. Just tell us your unimpeachable source(s) of reliable information.)

You are really not this blind or brain washed by the media are you? OPEN your eyes if you want to see my sources.

Of course you understand why I renamed illegals to "modern day slaves" right? I think I made that quite clear in a previous post. If you really don't remember, I'll be happy to tell you again. The explanation alone more than points out many slave lovers.; February 3, 2010 at 1:23 PM
Anonymous said...: My eyes are open- now just tell us who are reading- what are your sources? Spell them out.

Again, you started with name-calling. That says alot about your thinking and reasoning abilities. I don't recall anyone saying they are a "slave lover". So you made up some meaningless label. Just like you make up all your other garbage. What's your fascination with "slave lover"?

More about Arpaio now:

From the aforementioned East Valley Tribune Series:

On Oct. 22, for example, Arpaio sent the human smuggling unit to Fountain Hills.

The unit’s detectives had spent a year scouring rural highways in search of smugglers and their human cargo. But none of the smugglers’ known routes pass through Fountain Hills, where Arpaio lives. Most are on the other side of the county.

The operation was “based on information from local businesses in reference to the day laborers in the area,” Lt. Joseph Sousa wrote in an e-mail to Jason Kidd, ICE’s acting special agent in charge in Arizona.

( the article continues )

Early this year, Guadalupe residents saw a marked increase in the amount of drug dealing in their neighborhoods, and pushed the sheriff’s office for more enforcement, said Santino Bernasconi, a member of the town’s public safety committee.

Instead, in early April, MCSO sent its human smuggling unit to the urban community of Hispanics and Yaqui Indians for a saturation patrol. Deputies stopped vehicles for minor traffic offenses in order to question the occupants about their immigration status, reports show.

“We got some calls on some of these violent crimes that were illegals. So I figured, 'Wait a minute. We have a crime problem, illegal immigration probably, so let’s do suppression there,” Arpaio said.

Brian Sands, the MCSO law enforcement chief, said rising crime figures for the town justified the operation.

However, the monthly reports on criminal activity that the sheriff’s office provides to Guadalupe only show an increase in aggravated assaults and burglaries, not the kinds of crimes that officers would address through a sweep.

Then in June, dozens of MCSO deputies conducted a long anticipated two-day sweep through Mesa. This time, the operation came at the request of seven East Valley lawmakers who wrote a letter to Arpaio in April asking for immigration enforcement in their communities. One of the legislators was Rep. Russell Pearce, R-Mesa, who last year helped secure more than $1 million in state funding for MCSO’s immigration work.

The Mesa sweeps were a favor to officials who helped the sheriff’s office, Arpaio told the Tribune after the letter was made public.

“I have a strange old philosophy that if someone does something for you, gives you resources, gives you money, I think if they want something back, we ought to do it,” he said.

Pearce said the quid pro quo of immigration enforcement in exchange for state taxpayer dollars was appropriate.

“That’s what they’re for,” said Pearce, a former MCSO deputy himself. “It was approved by the Legislature. I expect him to use those funds for what they’re there for — that’s enforcement.”

ICE officials declined to comment on Arpaio’s statements about the Mesa operations, during which deputies used their federal powers to apprehend 28 illegal immigrants.

“We don’t respond to a politician’s public comments,” Picard said.; February 3, 2010 at 1:43 PM
Anonymous said...: It's obvious, but I will point out my typing error:
My eyes are open- now just tell us what (not who) you are reading- what are your sources? Spell them out.; February 3, 2010 at 1:45 PM
Anonymous said...: Okay, Mark, we've seen enough of your vague generalities. You have proved over weeks of time to be willing or able to give a single specific answer to any question. You have no credibility, and you've earned it.

His chief deputy earns (nay- makes) more than twice what the Sheriff does. Why? Is there another Sheriff in the country who pays any of his deputies more than he makes? I don't know- can someone answer that?

Now, more about Arpaio:
Two Republicans and an Independent running against Arpaio have all alleged abuses of power on the part of Sheriff Arpaio. In 2002, the county settled a lawsuit out of court with former employee Steve Barnes for wrongful termination after he blew the whistle on questionable tactics by the sheriff's office.

Barnes claimed that Arpaio's office wiretapped former Arpaio aide Tom Bearup and that it had targeted County Attorney Rick Romley for surveillance. Bearup, W. Steven Martin and Dan Saban, all running for sheriff against Arpaio this year, have also reported that they have been followed and harassed by sheriff's deputies.

Another example would also be the arrest of Nick Tarr, otherwise known as "Joe Arizona". In 2020 there were three hot propositions involving Indian gaming in Arizona, Nick's "Joe Arizona" character supported racetracks having slot machines, Sheriff Joe was supporting a proposition that kept Indian gaming on Indian land. For Halloween Nick decided to campaign in downtown Phoenix dressed as an officer. He went into his prop closet can came out with an old uniform shirt from DPS, his trademark "I Love Arizona" t-shirt, and a pair of Arpaio's pink boxer shorts.

Dave Hendersott, chief Deputy of the Sheriff's Office spotted Nick and he called DPS twice to have them come out and give Nick a citation. DPS officers came out and decided there was no crime. Undaunted, Hendershott then ordered his own deputies to arrest Tarr of impersonating an officer.

The charges against Tarr we later dropped and Tarr now has a lawsuit against the Sheriff's Office.; February 3, 2010 at 2:20 PM
Anonymous said...: Man- today's a bad typing day. Here's another correction:
Okay, Mark, we've seen enough of your vague generalities. You have proved over weeks of time to be UNwilling or UNable to give a single specific answer to any question. You have no credibility, and you've earned it; February 3, 2010 at 2:30 PM
Anonymous said...: More about Arpaio:
As an example in one of Arpaio's latest stunts, and at a time when there were 12 unsolved execution-style murders in the county, he staged a massive prostitution round-up publicity stunt.

This two month "sting operation" involved over 350 deputies that were pulled off other investigative details and patrol that resulted in 80 cases that have all been declined for prosecution by the Maricopa County Attorney's Office.

Nicholas Hentoff of Phoenix wrote in a letter to the Editor of the Arizona Republic" If Joe Arpaio continues to spend the county's scarce law enforcement dollars on chasing consenting adults engaged in private sexual activity, while child murders and sexual assaults remain unsolved, he should be the one to explain to the next grieving mother why her child's killer has not been caught, prosecuted and put in prison. And the taxpayers should send him a message by electing a new sheriff who doesn't treat public funds as his private public relations piggybank."; February 3, 2010 at 2:33 PM
Mark Gasser said...: To brain dead who posted this,

(So, how did this milk truck hit you head-on again Mark. You were drunk and crossed the lane?? Anyway, my offer still stands if you want a real education from some professionals who not only were on the border with me, but work it every day)

I was hit head on by a milk truck at 1:30 pm in the afternoon. NO, I was not drunk. The milk truck came around a curve at 40 miles per hour(estimated by the police) in my lane, in order to make the curve with a full load of milk. I couldn’t see him because of the high swamp trees right up to the edge of the road. Yes I got a hundred thousand dollar settlement from the moron. Most of which went to the doctors and lawyer. No, no REAL accident injury is worth the settlement.

Thanks for proving how little you know when you pretend to be God. As far as your buddies go, I really can’t give them much credibility, being an associate of yours and all. It is clear you are lost in space and we know our friends are a bit like us. Thanks but no thanks. Besides, I can see the border patrol in action. . Yes I am convinced the Boarder Patrol regulates how many slaves come in. NO, I don’t have the evidence to convict them, but plenty to come to the conclusion. Look at all the evidence. The slaves are let into every county in every state, protected. All but one county sheriff listens to the boarder patrol when they are told to leave the illegals alone. Yes I heard this from a sheriff other than Joe, when it came to the illegals, leave them alone, was the word they got from the boarder patrol. I‘m not saying your buddies are part of the system that allows illegals to walk right into our country, but plenty are part of that system. I also talked to illegals that claim the boarder patrol brings illegals in. Yes they said they were warned against saying a word. Yes there are illegals that are not afraid to tell me anything either. They were surprised when they didn’t have to convince me of their boarder patrol words!

You think I hate illegals and I’m a racist, you don’t know crap, I proved that above. As far as the modern day slaves go, I am completely on their side, except when it comes to coming here illegally. I wrote plenty about the modern day slaves, that more than backs up what I just said, look for your self. I’ve had many many hours of conversation, with many different modern day slaves. I know more about how and why they get here than you ever will know, obviously.

I don’t have to hide my name like you. Why?
I write the truth, that‘s why. If you can’t handle that, too bad. All I can say is, OPEN YOUR EYES.; February 3, 2010 at 2:33 PM
Anonymous said...: I'm not the person who posted anything about a milk truck. But this caught my eye: "I don’t have to hide my name like you. Why?
I write the truth, that‘s why."

If you're so truthful- why do you have to begin each response with childish name calling? Why can't you answer a single specific question with a specific answer? Like what news sources do you use? (Just few of many examples.) That reflects quite accurately on your credibility and how well-informed you really are. There's no need to resort to your tactics and call you names or label you. You make what you are painfully obvious. Funny how your opinion of yourself is so much better than it is for those who read your posts.

Why in the world do you think that after all the obviously manufactured baloney you've, we posted we'd take your word for it that your name isn't made-up? You probably thought of it at a gas station, or due to your uncontrollable verbal flatulence. It's pathetic that your answer to proven facts about Arpaio is to call someone a name, label them, or make up some allegation about them.

Unlike you, Mark Gasser, most readers don't confuse credulity with forming a well-informed opinion. There sure is enough information available to make failure to do so inexcusable.; February 3, 2010 at 3:15 PM
Anonymous said...: I don't like Arpaio but I don't agree with people posting a map to his house. He may suck as a sheriff but he does not deserve to have some crazy person stalking him or worse.; February 3, 2010 at 3:32 PM
Anonymous said...: I think Joe is the best Sheriff any state could ask for. He is not a sissy. YOU GO JOE!; February 3, 2010 at 3:49 PM
Anonymous said...: Police officers associations throughout the State of Arizona have voted "no confidence" in Joe Arpaio as Sheriff! These include; State of Arizona Fraternal Order of Police, Fraternal Order of Police Lodge Five, Maricopa County Deputies Association, Arizona Cops.; February 3, 2010 at 3:57 PM
Anonymous said...: That's right, the Maricopa County Deputies Association has no confidence in their boss!; February 3, 2010 at 3:59 PM
Anonymous said...: If this guy is the best Sheriff anyone could ask for- we're all in trouble! Maybe this person doesn't keep up with the news, maybe they just believe the PR propaganda- who knows?

Find me a Sheriff anywhere who is a sissy! That, thank goodness, is not the criterion for competence.; February 3, 2010 at 4:47 PM
Beano Before said...: I am an anti-"Gasser".

Please join me in petitioning KPHO to ban this poster. He is a fool and demonstrates it over and over again.; February 3, 2010 at 8:15 PM
Beano Before said...: I am an anti-"Gasser"

To Anonymous who said at 2:20 pm:

"The charges against Tarr we later dropped and Tarr now has a lawsuit against the Sheriff's Office."

Correction: Nick Tarr won a $125,000 settlement against the MCSO.

Just mentioning to prove your point. MSCO was malicious in their endeavor to prosecute Nick.; February 3, 2010 at 8:28 PM
Anonymous said...: I agree that his posts are ignorant, a waste of time and they distract from the actual facts and issues. However, I would hate to be in the position of Channel 5 having to decide who has a voice here and who is silenced. I don't see that happening unless profanity or some other outrage is involved.; February 3, 2010 at 8:36 PM
Beano Before said...: An anti-"Gasser"

On another article, he challenged KPHO repeatedly, as to their ethics in conducting this blog and made rather scathing comments regarding their political position. If I were KPHO editors, I would tell him to go elsewhere or start his own site. I watch KPHO every day and would love to see them take a stand on their position.; February 3, 2010 at 9:02 PM
Anonymous said...: I agree, he has never offered anything but what seems to be white supremacist propaganda and insults to those who don't buy it. He seems to believe it with all his heart, but he is completely immune to facts. His posts are garbage. I guess he has as much of a right to post them as any of us has to posts facts.

It seems to me that Channel 5 has bent over backward to satisfy him when he has made baseless accusations of bias on their part against him. I'm not a Channel 5 viewer in general, but think they're doing a good job of staying on top of Arpaio news, whether favorable and not toward Arpaio. I haven't detected any bias on their part, that is to say. I don't think Gasser registers the news that is favorable, but impugns their motives and objectivity when reports are made about something Arpaio has done or said that makes him look like a fool.

I think this blog would be much better without him and his ridiculous garbage and ramblings, but I don't see how they can ban him. Where would they draw the line?; February 3, 2010 at 10:22 PM
Mark Gasser said...: Hey brain dead,
You are talking to your self again. That's called NUTS whack-o case. Don't worry, the monster will go away when you fall asleep. Pray you don't wake up lol.; February 4, 2010 at 1:32 AM
Mark Gasser said...: Plenty of work for all but you,

If ALL the sheriffs in this great country, did as Joe and enforced all our laws, unemployment would fall and fall fast.

True enough, not many cared about the jobs the modern day slaves held, before the economy collapsed, except Joe. Some others did care, just not the majority. Some others being, the family farmers who’s farms were sold off to the banks. That are now mega farms ran by the slaves. Yes, Joe fought for these people long before it was a majority issue.

Now, the majority has their eye’s open wider than ever, when it comes to the modern day slaves. Many LEGAL Americans are out of work. Jobs they could and should be doing, are held by the modern day slaves, ILLEGALLY held that is.

The money system that runs most media and all other sheriffs, loves the modern day slaves. Without the slaves, they Federal government could not of cut milk prices in half to put the family farms out of business. To benefit the middle rich men.(milk prices only went up in the stores for the majority) The money that kept the family farm afloat, is now in the hands of the system that depends on the modern day slaves to make them richer.

Yes we have lots of work to be done in America. Once we stop the system that Joe bucks, and eliminate all the modern day slaves. It is time for the united majority of America, to take the power away from the system. When we do, we will have a good America for all that are legally here. With plenty of work for the ones who want it. For all truly good souls, there is only Joe’s ways to follow. Don’t let the media Hitlers brain wash you.

“Follow Joe, to a working legal America! Or follow the money system to hell.”; February 4, 2010 at 1:36 AM
Anonymous said...: After reading posts on this site for some time and enjoying the back and forth, I wish Gasser would only post occssionally. He takes up entirely too much space and monopolizes the page. If I were the blog manager, I would admonish him once or twice, and if he didn't stop hogging the site, I would ban him from posting.

I am in favor of freedom of speech, but this is a public site provided by a local business and I believe they would not be out of line to take this action.

Gasser needs something else in his life to occupy his time. Take a break. Don't hog the space on the site. People are getting tired of the same person all the time.; February 4, 2010 at 6:52 AM
Anonymous said...: I am so sick of all the people not letting Sheriff Joe do his job. He may have some rough tactics, but maybe he is trying to get criminals to learn a lesson and maybe NOT want to go back to jail.
As for his illegal alien sweeps. More power to you. I have NO problem with someone coming to the USA as long as they do it legally. If I wanted to move to another country. You can bet I would do whatever it takes to be there legally.
My brother was a prison guard and some of the stories I was told . . . well lets just say the illegals have NO BUSINESS filling our jails. Funny how illegal aliens somehow get on our welfare, get free healthcare, and somehow don't seem to have to pay taxes on what they earn. I am a hard working, struggling AZ resident, and I don't get any of those!!!!!
Sheriff Joe, you should be applauded.; February 4, 2010 at 8:14 AM
Anonymous said...: Yeah thanks for all of the convenient background info, "My brother was a prison guard and some of the stories I was told..."

I love these pro Joe propaganda posts. Where does the MCSO find these retards?; February 4, 2010 at 8:42 AM
Anonymous said...: Don't the Arpaio supporters know that this is not about immigration? It's about county law enforcement being out of control.

They go after those who disagree with them. They will find some reason to arrest those who attempt to limit the illegal acts of these very dangerous people. This is not cold war Russia, nor is it nazi Germany. This is the United States of America.

This approach to governance is not what I fought for as a fighter pilot during the Vietnam war. My buddies, who gave their lives for this country, did not make the ultimate sacrifice for this kind of country. We all did what we did for a great and free United States A nation which is grater than that promoted by these people who misunderstand what principles we were founded on.

This is a free country. A country of laws, not men. A sheriff is not empowered to intimidate just because those in his sights disagree with him or limit his activities withing the laws of the land.

I urge all of you to think about what so many have died for. Think about the freedoms this great nation affords us. Don't let petty tyrants take it away from us in the name of security or any other feel-good idea.; February 4, 2010 at 10:22 AM
Anonymous said...: Exactally, I also served. I fought in Iraq and Afghanistan as a ground pounder. It is so important for people to remember that fact. If they let these kinds of actions continue they may find themselves fighting for their very freedoms and lives here in the USA. If that happens it would be devastating.; February 4, 2010 at 11:15 AM
Anonymous said...: I think everyone needs to realize that we all sit and complain about things. He steps up and is trying to help out with the things most people complain about and everyone is bashing him for it. I work hard to pay my bills I don't have insurance and it's costing me a lot of money to get medical attention. But my taxes are paying for illegals to have more rights then I do and I was born in the USA.

When will someone help us people that pay taxes and work hard everyday to support a family? I feel bad for the people who are coming into the USA to have a better life but what about the people that are born here that can't make ends even 10 feet apart. People struggling like me know what I mean.

We should be working together to solve the problem not fighting each other.; February 4, 2010 at 12:15 PM
Anonymous said...: Many applaud Arapio for making the jails tough, and take him at his word that he is saving money and reducing recidivism. What are the facts?

From Wikipedia. The numerals are references, you can look them up under the article "Joe Arpaio" there:

Under Arpaio, the Maricopa County Sheriff’s Office has been criticized by numerous human rights organizations.

From 2004 through November 2007, Arpaio was the target of 2,150 lawsuits in U.S. District Court and hundreds more in Maricopa County courts, with more than $50 million in claims being filed,[35] 50 times as many prison-conditions lawsuits as the New York City, Los Angeles, Chicago, and Houston jail systems combined.[36] Allegations of cruel treatment of inmates as well as living conditions have been cited by Amnesty International in a report issued on the treatment of inmates in Maricopa County facilities.[37]

In her book on prison policy The Use of Force by Detention Officers, Arizona State University criminal justice professor Marie L. Griffin reported on a 1998 study commissioned by Arpaio to examine recidivism rates based on conditions of confinement. Comparing recidivism rates under Arpaio to those under his predecessor, the study found "there was no significant difference in recidivism observed between those offenders released in 1989-1990 and those released in 1994-1995."[38]; February 4, 2010 at 12:29 PM
Anonymous said...: The most comprehensive study of the operation and performance of MCSO, that I was able to locate to-date was a study done by the Goldwater Institute. (If you know of another, kindly post that) It is entitled "Mission Unaccomplished: The Misplaced Priorities of the Maricopa County Sheriff ’s Office". They cite all of the (87) sources of the information published therein. It is pretty lengthy (about 20 pages), but worth reading if you want facts about MCSO's performance. Since I think that society has a demonstrated need for competent law enforcement, I found it alarming. It is available free-of-charge here: http://www.goldwaterinstitute.org/Common/Img/Mission Unaccomplished.pdf

Here's an excerpt:
It is difficult to track even basic MCSO crime statistics. Local police
departments, including Phoenix and Tempe, make crime rate statistics available on
their websites. By contrast, MCSO’s website appears to contain no crime statistics
or budget figures, except for an occasional news release.
Th e taxpayers and their representatives cannot determine MCSO’s effectiveness
or its stewardship of public funds without carefully kept and easily accessible
statistics. MCSO annually reports that the most basic crime statistics it provides
to the county are incomplete. Given that the safety and security of Maricopa
County’s citizens is at stake, better record-keeping and greater transparency is
essential.; February 4, 2010 at 12:36 PM
Anonymous said...: This man just does not get it at all his poll numbers are down among his own party and the independents. He is driving the independents away from the Republican Party and finally people are awaking to see this party for who that are just a bunch of RED NECKS scard to be a minority. It is too late its KARMA whats goes around comes around. You treated just about every ethnic group like trash so you creat laws to try and control them. NO MORE 2010 election will prove to you Republicans ARIZONA VOTERS HAVE HAS ENOUGH OF Joe Arpiao, and Russell Pierce.; February 4, 2010 at 2:30 PM
Anonymous said...: Goldwater piss,

if you want to read a bunch of bull crap and twisted facts, then go read the goldwater piss report.; February 4, 2010 at 4:18 PM
Anonymous said...: I know, I read Goldwater piss report lol, what a pathedic joke lol again!; February 4, 2010 at 4:19 PM
Anonymous said...: A true system scam the goldwater piss report.

Pathedic joke? More like system brain washing!; February 4, 2010 at 4:21 PM
Anonymous said...: You know what is PATHETIC? Stupid people who can't spell PATHETIC.; February 4, 2010 at 4:24 PM
Anonymous said...: I noticed you who complain about the most complete report that I know of, posted not ONE single fact. Do you know of another well-researched report? I asked about that in my post, you realize? I know- it's the best you can do, name-calling. Yup, that's pathetic. And you had to post three times to get one thought across. More pathetic. And you can't spell! More pathetic still.

Next.

Mark E. Gasser (yes, you) you have yet to post a single verifiable specific fact, but that's what your beliefs are based upon. Pathetic.

I hope that this will encourage people to read this (or any factual) report. People like Mark Gasser promote Arpaio's propaganda, without any factual basis. Why do they get so nasty when they're (or he's) exposed???; February 4, 2010 at 7:56 PM
Beano Before said...: I am an anti- "Gasser"

I notice that Mark has not posted as Mark recently. I'm thinking he's gone to "anonymous" that has been posting about the Goldwater Institute as being "piss". Sounds like something Mark would say. If not, and I could be wrong, maybe KPHO HAS banned him, and I would be grateful for it.; February 4, 2010 at 8:44 PM
Beano Before said...: I am an anti-"Gasser"

Wow! No "signed" posts from Mark since just after midnight. While I think he is still here talking to himself as usual, it's still refreshing to have a few brief exchanges between "anonymouses" rather than his typical long rants!

Is it possible that he was FINALLY arrested by MCSO for Felony Abuse of his Keyboard?; February 4, 2010 at 9:03 PM
Anonymous said...: I also think he's posting as anyonymous. You mentioned how that poster referred to Goldwater in exactly the same way. And they can't spell, and they don't post a single specific fact, and make no sense! Yep, who else could it be?

I don't care if he's banned. It's easy to tell he doesn't know a thing he's talking about. People's posts here have shown they think of him what he deserves to be thought of him. Namely, nothing.; February 4, 2010 at 9:18 PM
Spell Checker is free said...: Agreed! The PATHETIC human being known as Mark Gasser has been outed as a PATHETIC loser.; February 5, 2010 at 2:12 AM
Mark Gasser said...: Hmmm, looks like I got the psychopathic in a tisssseee lol. This is the same child that worships the goldwater piss repost lol again.; February 5, 2010 at 4:25 AM
Mark Gasser said...: If you want to know the truth about the system and why I support the only politician that bucks the system, Joe. Just click on my name, there is plenty there to read, that proves who runs this country.

Make sure you read the article "Prodigal Sun." It more than proves why we run on oil and not free solar for the majority. We had the technology to be getting our power from the sun since the seventies, until Regan took the solar panels off the white house, orders by the oil system that owns every Republican politician and even Obama.

Read the articles about why we buy oil from Iran, the same country that wants us dead. They have a gun pointed at us right now, and we’re buying their bullets! You can read about the fact, Canada is our number one supplier of oil and Mexico is number two. Yes Mexico has plenty of oil to be our number one supplier, but the money system doesn't want to lose their modern day slaves. The oil lords that run our politicians, want us to keep buying bullets! To keep their billion dollar supertankers running and spilling their oil in our oceans. Yes, Mexico has more oil than we can burn, but the system’s money is invested in Iran, the same government that hates us all.

The money system hates Joe most of all. You think illegals hate Joe? There hate is nothing compared to the hatred of the money system, that can’t buy Joe. Joe arrest their modern day slave, YES they hate Joe big time. I like Joe, a politician that has no problem bucking the system for us, the united majority of America.; February 5, 2010 at 4:27 AM
Mark Gasser said...: It was fine for Goldwater to use one of Joe’s deputies, to say Joe isn’t doing his job, but when I posted the following exact words from goldwater piss, their supporter here then had a problem with it. Here are his words to me, after I posted goldwater plissé’s exact words.

(Officer Erfle was doing is job. Joe isn't. Stop besmirching the name of Erfle. Do you know whether he was a Joe supporter? Until you get permission from his widow- please don't mention him again.)

Following are the exact words of goldwater piss report. The report their paid cheerleader wants us to read!

Goldwater Institute says,

When two Phoenix police officers stopped a man and two women for jay walking in September 2007, a confrontation ensued and Officer Nick Erfle was shot and killed. Erfle was 33 years old, the father of two young children, and had just overcome a battle with cancer. The man suspected of killing him, Erik Martinez, was an illegal immigrant who had previously been deported. Notably, he was the subject of an outstanding felony warrant for aggravated assault.

The real fact is, Joe did his job, goldwater used the facts and twists them against Joe. If the Federal government would keep it’s end of the bargain up and stop the illegals that freely walk across our boarders. There would of never been another incident from Erik Martinez.

Goldwater wants you to think it is Joe’s fault. Right after their words above, they state how many pending warrants are in our county. Joe would love to go to all their homes and kick open the door. Why? When his deputies knock on a door of a person with a warrant, if they don’t answer the door, there is nothing Joe’s deputies can do. The real FACT of the matter is, most people with warrants are not arrested until after their name is ran by an officer on the streets, for a completely different issue. Goldwater and it’s supporter here, are both pathetic jokes!

Yes the money system that runs us, hates Joe, that is why I like him. He stands up for a United Majority of America.; February 5, 2010 at 5:47 AM
Anonymous said...: That's just brilliant Corky! You are the biggest retard to ever post here. To be honest, you hurt the sheriff's cause more than you help it. There must be a job out there for you someplace like, sanitation worker, or ditch digger, or fast food worker, or.....; February 5, 2010 at 8:49 AM
Anonymous said...: He's the best _od damn thing that's ever happened to this state.....; February 5, 2010 at 9:39 AM
Anonymous said...: Gasser didn't post a single fact with a citation or reference. He makes them up. And not very well at that.; February 5, 2010 at 10:03 AM
Anonymous said...: If he were a fact factory, he would have been named Mark Facter. And he's not the Mark Factor, he a Gasser! And he doesn't like anyone telling the truth about Arpaio. He calls people names and then says they act like children. Ha!!!

Read the Goldwater report or any report with cited facts about the Sheriff! Right, Mark?; February 5, 2010 at 10:11 AM
Anonymous said...: Hey Mark,

You can't spend your whole life in ignorance having never completed a quality education and expect people with an education to take you seriously. Any educated person can tell that you don't know sh*t. You can't just Bullsh*t your way through life expecting others to take you seriously. Do yourself a favor. Enroll in college. Take a few classes on say English composition and debate. Then comeback.; February 5, 2010 at 12:09 PM
Anonymous said...: And spelling- take a few grade school classes.; February 5, 2010 at 12:12 PM
Anonymous said...: Mark- what I get from reading that report is that MCSO doesn't make their records known, and doesn't compile accurate records. From what can be determined, there's evidence that MCSO falls FAR SHORT IN CATEGORIES THAT CAN BE MEASURED AGAINST AGENCIES CHARGED WITH SIMILAR RESPONISIBILITIES.

Other news reports, such as the series in the East Valley Tribune, which is up for a Pulitzer prize- make similar findings.

Those are the facts as we know them. You think people are going to listen to stuff made up by some guy who doesn't seem to be educated well enough to express himself or use logic?; February 5, 2010 at 1:33 PM
Anonymous said...: I meant to say that MCSO doesn't release complete records. My statement above might indicate that they release nothing (except plenty of press released that are pro-Joe).; February 5, 2010 at 2:03 PM
Anonymous said...: Sheriff Joe is suffering for Reverse discrimination. Joe is doing the Job he is supposed to do, But there are so many Illegals in Arizona now, that they can actually power an opposition to a MAN who has the Balls to enforce the law.
Round up all the illegals,ship them to a Prison in Alaska--that will fix them.
BTW, Maybe next time there is a protset--the MCSO should cordon off the protesters and check them for green cards.

JOE-You are the MAN; February 5, 2010 at 5:56 PM
Anonymous said...: Sheriff Joe is suffering for Reverse discrimination....Illegals...blah...blah...blah

Illegals can't vote, you know? So where are the metrics showing MCSO's effectiveness on this single, all-important issue? The actual information (not PR stunts) available indicates that Arpio doesn't do all that well in the one category that you idolize him for.; February 5, 2010 at 6:24 PM
Liz F - North Phoenix said...: "Beano Before
I am an anti-Gasser"

ROTFLMFAO!! That is brilliant.

Where do I sign you petition?

That being said, I make no bones about the fact that I do not like Joseph M. Arpaio.

However, I do think that it was out of line for this group to do what they did. If you want to get it contact with Joe, do it at the Wells Fargo tower. No need to bring Eva and the family dog into. You never know when someone will decide to blow up the house and chase Joe's dog back into the fire, right?; February 5, 2010 at 7:15 PM
Smell the retard said...: Some tard above said,

"But there are so many Illegals in Arizona now, that they can actually power an opposition to a MAN who has the Balls to enforce the law."

I am not a big fan of illegal immigration. I just can't support Joe and his abuse of power. I am also not a big fan of stupid people, and mister, you must be really dumb.; February 5, 2010 at 8:29 PM
Liz F - North Phoenix said...: For those of you who did not catch the "chase Joe's dog back into the fire" reference I made above, you need to read this story:

http://www.phoenixnewtimes.com/2004-08-05/news/dog-day-afternoon; February 5, 2010 at 11:26 PM
Mark Gasser said...: Liz, still crying about the puppy, get a life, it was an ACCIDENT!!!!

I know I know, the media has you convinced other wise. I expained it to you once, but because you got nothing on Joe and no life, it went in one sheep ear and out the other blind sheep ear. It's people like you that got this country into the mess it is for sure.; February 6, 2010 at 1:17 AM
Mark Gasser said...: Aw, did I upset the blind Joe bashers again! That's not to hard to do, especially the goldwater piss repost paid cheerleader lol.
Lots a blind sheep here, that thinks them and America are the best thing that ever happened to the world. America has the best constitution in the world, but the blind sheep here, screw it up for everyone else.; February 6, 2010 at 1:18 AM
If you smell what the dumass is cookin said...: The only blind sheep in here is you. There is no hope for the stupid man who does not recognize his own failings.; February 6, 2010 at 8:55 AM
Liz F - North Phoenix said...: Gasser said "Liz, still crying about the puppy, get a life, it was an ACCIDENT!!!

First of all, Mark, your score on punctuation and sentence structure is a D- .

Secondly, please explain how these events constitute "an accident" :

As black smoke billowed from the house, Barker says, Kush frantically tried to get Dre to run outside, the puppy yelping "like a baby."

At one point, Dre ran from the master bedroom and bolted down the stairs toward the front door, where it came face to face with a SWAT team member. Instead of letting the dog run outside, the SWAT member reportedly launched a counterattack.

"They shot the dog in the face with a fire extinguisher when he tried to come out of the fire," says Trisha Golden, Gabrial's younger sister, who helped raise the dog and was outside the burning home calling for it to come out. She did not live at the house, but hung out there frequently, she says. She heard about the fire and came immediately. "He turned and ran back into the master bedroom and burned [to death]."

Delfino says he asked one of the SWAT officers what happened to Dre and was told that the dog had been "neutralized" with the fire extinguisher. He asked the officer if the dog had attacked anybody, and the cop said no.

Yeah, right. It was an "accident". And you call ME a blind sheep. You're a fool and a liar, Mark Gasser.; February 6, 2010 at 9:11 AM
Anonymous said...: You've been pegged Gasser. You might think you're a blind shepherd, but that doesn't make those of us who can read and think for ourselves blind sheep.; February 6, 2010 at 10:17 AM
Anonymous said...: I posted the info about the GW report (and some other reports like Wikipedia). Nobody's paying me. Period. I like it when the law is properly enforced and records are kept and made known. Period.

Your other garbage has that same made-up quality- IT'S INCORRECT! Were you put together from spare parts of animals? Go back- they forgot to give you a human brain, hamster boy!

I can only conclude that you consider Joe Arpaio a white supremacist like yourself. Is that so? Funny how your tactics are as transparently childish as his.; February 6, 2010 at 10:23 AM
Anonymous said...: Why can't Mark Gasser stand the truth? I just drives him batty!!!; February 6, 2010 at 3:10 PM
Mark Gasser said...: Liz, YOUR score of being a brain washed blind sheep is an A+

Blind sheep is a nice term, I won't tell what most here think of you. Still you got the "A+"

The swat member that you blame, did nothing wrong, as Joe has already told you. I know this is impossible for you to comprehend, but, I will explain why Joe says his deputy did nothing wrong. Just for shits and giggles, try to open your eyes blind sheep.

The officer that fired this fire extinguisher, did what all police do, when faced with defending them self. This officer had no idea what this dog, or poor puppy, was going to do. The officer was faced with defending him self, just from being in a burning building. When the dog ran towards him, the officer instinctively, squeezed tight on the handle of his first line of defense. In this case, it fired a fire extinguisher, instead of a griping his gun. Had he a gun, something this officer is VERY trained in using, their would have been no harm. Squeezing the handle of a gun, doesn’t fire it. Unfortunately for the dog, it did fire the fire extinguisher. This instinctive action caused the dog to run back into a the flames.

NO this officer isn’t some kind of Satanist, that wanted the dog to burn, like YOU are trying to tell all. You have no clue what this officer deals with here, so don’t pretend to know. You are a media brain washed blind sheep, not God like you think you are. Your as blind as the goldwater piss report cheerleader. Sad, you both pretend people listens to you? You two answer your self with anonymous after anonymous, talking to your selves. That is call nuts! You are more than nuts to sit here and imply this was a purposely done act. Now you want Joe to pay for this accident? Man are you nuts.; February 7, 2010 at 6:22 AM
Liz F - North Phoenix said...: Mark,

Since the offending officer was SWAT, he was fully decked out in protective armorment (helmet, vest, etc.) If he's afraid of a puppy, he shouldn't have been on the SWAT Team.

They were storming the house in a vain search for a massive weapons and ammunition stash. If he wasn't afraid of 'cop killer bullets' and illegal weapons, why was he afraid of a puppy trying to run out of a burning house and why did he laugh when the puppy's owner became hysterical over the cruel treatment of her pet?

No, I think Joe did NOT explain this to me already. What he did was cover it up, as he has done so many times with the deaths of MCSO canines, and serious injuries and deaths of persons in custody in the MCSO jails. His officers NEVER do anything wrong. The "in depth" (note the sarcasm here) investigations into the deaths of 3 MCSO canines was revealed during the Lovejoy investigation and the fact that those deaths were quietly swept under the rug and NOT investigated for wrong-doing on the part of the MCSO officers involved was detailed by Lovejoy's attorney. When Lovejoy's attorney wanted to depose Joe about all 4 investigations (Lovejoy and his own 3 officers) suddenly Joe knew nothing about any of it, a direct contradiction to his very public statements over and over that HE HAD CONDUCTED INVESTIGATIONS AND DRAWN HIS CONCLUSIONS BASED ON THAT INFORMATION. Suddenly, he was not involved in the investigations, he had no personal knowledge to share, he was not the one who made decisions, etc. Cover up and play dumb, as is typical for Joe when he is confronted with having to explain himself. Case to point: he supposedly has not read his own book, "Joe's Law" and doesn't know what it says. He wants to take star credit for anything that wins him camera time and the sheeples' vote, and deny knowledge of anything that draws criticism. He takes no responsibility for how his office is run.

He's a LOSER, and so are you.; February 7, 2010 at 7:27 AM
Mark Gasser said...: Liz,
You are pathetic, to say the least. You are the LOSER media brain washed, who thinks she can do better than a swat officer. The only swat you got is the size of a fly, so fly high in your own little immature world. Down here on earth, you are nothing but an A+ scoring blind sheep.; February 7, 2010 at 7:52 AM
Anonymous said...: Gasser- you make sense only to yourself. Lean how to read-up on Joe. ICE takes lots of illegals into custody. They are scrutinized by the media when they make a mistake. So are other agencies. Your theory doesn' hold water.

Wake up, Mark, it a system of delusions- communicable ones. Mr. Gasser: If you want to stop being a blind sheep get psychiatric help.

If you don't like the others here- why in the world do you keep coming back? To make sure that people will read the Goldwater Report, the East Valley Tribune series, and the Wikipedia article on "Joe Arpaio"?; February 7, 2010 at 7:54 AM
Mark Gasser said...: Liz, YOUR score of being a brain washed blind sheep is an A+

Blind sheep is a nice term, I won't tell what most here think of you. Still you got the "A+"

The swat member that you blame, did nothing wrong, as Joe has already told you. I know this is impossible for you to comprehend, but, I will explain why Joe says his deputy did nothing wrong. Just for shits and giggles, try to open your eyes blind sheep.

The officer that fired this fire extinguisher, did what all police do, when faced with defending them self. This officer had no idea what this dog, or poor puppy, was going to do. The officer was faced with defending him self, just from being in a burning building. When the dog ran towards him, the officer instinctively, squeezed tight on the handle of his first line of defense. In this case, it fired a fire extinguisher, instead of a griping his gun. Had he a gun, something this officer is VERY trained in using, their would have been no harm. Squeezing the handle of a gun, doesn’t fire it. Unfortunately for the dog, it did fire the fire extinguisher. This instinctive action caused the dog to run back into a the flames.

NO this officer isn’t some kind of Satanist, that wanted the dog to burn, like YOU are trying to tell all. You have no clue what this officer deals with here, so don’t pretend to know. You are a media brain washed blind sheep, not God like you think you are. Your as blind as the goldwater piss report cheerleader. Sad, you both pretend people listens to you? You two answer your self with anonymous after anonymous, talking to your selves. That is call nuts! You are more than nuts to sit here and imply this was a purposely done act. Now you want Joe to pay for this accident? Man are you nuts.; February 7, 2010 at 7:54 AM
Anonymous said...: No need to post twice- everyone else here can read, think, spell. Nobody gives a hoot what you think or post here, Mark, comprendo?; February 7, 2010 at 8:00 AM
Liz F - North Phoenix said...: Mark,

Please DO tell me what most people here think of me. I can read the way people respond to my posts and to yours.

I think I'd like your take on that, though; just for laughs.

Why don't you point out some posts from persons other than YOU that dispute or criticize my posts. Just point me to some by indicating "Anonymous said at 7:54 AM on Feb 7..."

I KNOW why you "won't tell me what most people here think of me". Most people think that I make sense and that you're annoying.; February 7, 2010 at 8:32 AM
Anonymous said...: I can't say that I speak for everybody, but Liz is right? But of course when you're a blind shepherd everyone else looks like a blind sheep. I'd suggest that you post elsewhere, anywhere else.; February 7, 2010 at 10:59 AM
Anonymous said...: You've roundly made a fool of yourself as far as I'm concerned.; February 7, 2010 at 11:14 AM
Anonymous said...: MOST PEOPLE THINK JOE IS DOING A GREAT JOB !! IT' JUST THE DO-GOODERS THAT ARE AFTER HIM !!!!!!!!; February 7, 2010 at 11:25 AM
Anonymous said...: It's called enforcing the law. If one public official abuses the law he should be investigated. Joe is no different. He is not above the law. Just because he is your hero does not mean he can do whatever he wishes. Justice is coming!; February 7, 2010 at 12:08 PM
Liz F - North Phoenix said...: Anonymous said "MOST PEOPLE THINK JOE IS DOING A GREAT JOB !! IT' JUST THE DO-GOODERS THAT ARE AFTER HIM !!!!!!!!"

Does this mean it's the DO-BADDERS that are for him? LOL!

If so, I concur! You nailed it!; February 7, 2010 at 12:28 PM
Anonymous said...: Yeah, Mark, posting anonymously? Most people don't seem like or agree with your views and your name-calling.; February 7, 2010 at 1:08 PM
Liz F - North Phoenix said...: Anonymous said...
Anonymous said:

"I can't say that I speak for everybody, but Liz is right? But of course when you're a blind shepherd everyone else looks like a blind sheep. I'd suggest that you post elsewhere, anywhere else."

February 7, 2010 10:59 AM

I am a little confused. The Blind Shepherd, I think, refers to Mark, but you have a question mark after "Liz is right". I'm not sure what you're saying. Are you agreeing with me or agreeing with Mark?

Again, I'll suggest this for anyone willing to do it: Please choose a "name" and post under that "name". It doesn't have to be your NAME -it can be something like ASUFan or BBQ1 or Turbo or whatever - It's easier to keep track of people who are not posting as anonymous. If you "chose a name", the site will tell you it did not post your message. Chose post again and it will let you post after you fill in a 'bot' key. That would help a lot in terms of who is responding to who.; February 7, 2010 at 7:00 PM
Anonymous said...: This quote probably sums up the Joe supporters rather nicely.

If everyone is thinking alike, then somebody isn't thinking.

George S. Patton; February 7, 2010 at 7:31 PM
Anonymous said...: I made a typing error- that was meant to read:
"I can't say that I speak for everybody, but Liz is right."; February 7, 2010 at 9:00 PM
Lawn order said...: Test post under name; February 8, 2010 at 7:09 AM
lawn order said...: I think that Mark Gasser's ideas would be put to much better use fertilizing mushrooms. It smells as though he might've stolen the from such a facility.; February 8, 2010 at 7:16 AM
Anonymous said...: Mark, it looks like more and more people are getting the word out that you are nothing but a fool who writes foolish things about a foolish sheriff. The public has your number and that of Arpaio and his henchmen. What will you do when they are all in jail?

It is obvious that people can tell the difference between literate discourse and your stuff.

My davice? Get a life outside of this blog. Arpaio's time has come.

You and the rest of the Arpaio gang should have been smart enough to know that a lie always unravels in the end -- and the liar always get cauught.

Arpaio is not a lawman, he is a lying egomaniacle disgrace.; February 8, 2010 at 8:58 AM
Anonymous said...: I could not have said it better myself. This sheriff has been pulling to wool over the eyes of gullible people of for years. He bases everything he does on a lie, or the false perceptions he creates for his electorate. Well, he might be able to fool my parents generation but he won't fool mine! My generation know Bullshit when we see it!

"a lie always unravels in the end"

So True!; February 8, 2010 at 9:35 AM
Anonymous said...: Why would any harsh or illegal activity from those that support illegal activity be a surprise? These groups are not concerned about the law or people. Just like the activities of Mary Rose Wilcox are not suprising. If one does not support the law, it should surprise no one when they break the law. I just hope their actions do not cause harm.; February 8, 2010 at 2:18 PM
Anonymous said...: If the person above is referring to not supporting Arpaio as the "law," he does not represent the law. He, indeed, is a corruption of the law.

I agree that if Mary Rose Wilcox is guilty of wrongdoing, she should pay the piper. However, it certainly looks as though her opposition to Arpaio is the reason for her coming under scrutiny. If that is so, and I really don't know if it is or it isn't, Arpaio is using his office to harass and intimidate. We cannot tolerate this kind of activity from anyone in government -- least of all from a sheriff. To tolerate this kind of activity is to condone the activities of the SS and the SA in another country in the '30s and '40s,

The courts must find the truth without fear of retribution form any so-called law enforcement agency.; February 8, 2010 at 2:35 PM
Lawn order said...: To the brain challenged person who posted the following: "Why would any harsh or illegal activity from those that support illegal activity be a surprise?" and "I just hope their actions do not cause harm." This post induced a small chuckle.

By definition when one breaks the law, one is causing actual or possible harm. By definition Arpaio is breaking the law, and if the system works he, and his, will get theirs.; February 8, 2010 at 3:18 PM
Anonymous said...: Maybe Arpaio should have been thinking about the harm he is causing others. He is or had tried to use his power to harm the innocent. This is not a third world country where you can harass other for sport. This is America. If Joe was so patriotic who would follow the law and not look for loopholes in it that he feels he can get away with. The man is scum in my opinion and I used to have a favorable opinion of the man.

Someone wrote:

Why would any harsh or illegal activity from those that support illegal activity be a surprise? These groups are not concerned about the law or people. Just like the activities of Mary Rose Wilcox are not suprising. If one does not support the law, it should surprise no one when they break the law. I just hope their actions do not cause harm.; February 8, 2010 at 3:18 PM
Lawn order said...: "Da' tuffest Sheruf" (self-proclaimed)- here's some news:
1) Tough is different than loud publicity hound
2) Tough is not as good as effective
3) Nobody but you and your drones say you're tough
4) Please define tough
5) If you put your name on a book, especially in the title, like "Joe's Law...blah, blah, blah" it would behoove you and the society you claim to serve if you read it. Don't you think you should know what you said?; February 8, 2010 at 3:25 PM
Anonymous said...: THE PROOF IS IN THE GREAT SHERIFF JOE ARPIO!!!! YOU GO JOE!!!!! WE ALL SEE WHAT PROGRESSIVE CORRUPTION IS TRYING TO DO. PROGRESSIVES=DISASTERS! THEY CAN'T TOUCH AZ. BEST SHERIFF!!!!!!!!!; February 8, 2010 at 4:50 PM
Mark Gasser said...: It was nice not to see all the child comments on here for a day. But guess what, I'm BACK.
Yes I know, you can lead a blind sheep to the truth, but you can't make them swallow it. You media brain wash really give me something to laugh about. Mark my words.

The only words here with a name? Why are all you Joe bashers afraid to post your name? Let me guess, Joe whacked your peepee once for braking the law, and now all you bashers are afraid lol. It explains the many cries about puppies and goldwater piss. Hey, Joe is not a problem when you “don’t unleash the power of the MCSO." For all the brain dead here, this means,, “don’t break the laws of our land," especially on Joe’s!!!!!!!; February 8, 2010 at 5:01 PM
Liz F - North Phoenix said...: Yes, Mark, it WAS nice not to see all of your child (sic) comments on here for a day. But now you're BACK!

Crap! I thought your mommy took away your keyboard.

It WAS nice, though, not to have your child (sic) comments on here for a day though.

Thanks for giving us a little break!; February 8, 2010 at 5:31 PM
Anonymous said...: Who is the retard who always posts in caps? Is this the typical Arpaio voter? how scary!; February 8, 2010 at 5:37 PM
Anonymous said...: TYPICAL PROGESSIVE, CALLING NAMES....SO, YOU MUST BE ONE; February 8, 2010 at 6:07 PM
Lawn order said...: Liz - Ditto what you said

APPARENTLY THE ALL CAPS POST WAS MARK GASSER. LIKE HE SAID: THE CHILDISH POSTS WERE (MOSTLY) GONE FOR A DAY). Mark why don't you take another (much, MUCH longer) break? Surely you can just sit and stare at a blow-up doll of your Arpaio idol, and keep away from your keyboard? It would be much appreciated!

And- everyone, don't forget to tell you friends to look up the Wikipedia article on "Joe Arpiao", read the 5-part Pulitzer nominated East Valley Tribune series on MCSO, and the Goldwater Institute report on MCSO.; February 8, 2010 at 6:08 PM
Lawn order said...: Obviously I meant "don't forget to tell your friends...". I usually talk better than I type, but not always.; February 8, 2010 at 6:10 PM
A White Guy said...: Mark Gasser must be wite suprmecit. He better than everone well not Joe. Goe Joe!!! Hi Mark.

Go Mark!!! Go to the same island far away with your idol. I didn't choose to be born white and neither did you, Mark Gasser. But I did choose not to be ignorant. There might still be time for you.

Tell us, really, does Joe attend your meetings? I understand that this imputes a level of organization that is probably beyond your capabilities (and obviously those of MCSO under Arpaio). That means that you probably can't find whatever meetings there might be. Somebody's watching you. Sleep well, Mark. The sooner the better (unless you type while you sleep, which would not be a great surprise to anyone who's read your nonsense posts).

He probably wouldn't go, is my guess. There are no broadcast TV cameras at those meetings, so I don't think he'd attend.

See how popular you and your ignorant views are?; February 8, 2010 at 6:22 PM
Anonymous said...: YOU SHOULD NEVER ASSUME.....IT WAS'NT MARK!!!!!! THERE ARE OTHER PEOPLE TOO...HELLO; February 8, 2010 at 6:24 PM
Anonymous said...: You are Mark's cousin/uncle.; February 8, 2010 at 6:38 PM
Anonymous said...: So Mark has multiple personalities and they're all the same. No biggie! Your mothers must be very proud of you, Junior, Mark, Chuckles, etc, etc, etc!

There is no intent to offend anyone with a mental illness- this appears to be a choice that Gasser made. Or a series or very tragic mistakes, or maybe his upbringing. I shouldn't attempt to make excuses for him.

It's odd though, he claimed on at least one occasion to have a "normal mind". A paranoid person earnestly believes that "everyone" is out to get him. In reality, "everyone" doesn't think that. There's no way to cure this on a blog. That's a fact.; February 8, 2010 at 6:57 PM
Liz F - North Phoenix said...: Anonymous said...
Who is the retard who always posts in caps? Is this the typical Arpaio voter? how scary!

February 8, 2010 5:37 PM

That would be Mark. Or maybe his buddy JW Simms who hasn't been around for quite a while. Maybe he's on vacation from the MCSO and doesn't have time to post when he's not getting paid by Joe to do it.

Anonymous said...
YOU SHOULD NEVER ASSUME.....IT WAS'NT MARK!!!!!! THERE ARE OTHER PEOPLE TOO...HELLO

Sir or Madam, like Mark, you receive a D- in punctation and sentence structure. And the Cap Lock key is on the left. Stop YELLING.

To Lawn Order - love it! Keep it coming!; February 8, 2010 at 7:01 PM
Liz F - North Phoenix said...: Anonymous said:

"There is no intent to offend anyone with a mental illness- this appears to be a choice that Gasser made. Or a series or very tragic mistakes, or maybe his upbringing. I shouldn't attempt to make excuses for him."

I saw something a ways up on this page that says he was in a head on collision with a milk truck. Maybe he suffered some brain damage as a result. I don't know. Until I know that I'm talking with a person who has a verifiable mental disability, I'm treating him as someone who is just mentally incompetent due to lack of education and innate intelligence. You can't blame someone for being impaired or stupid by nature - only by choice.; February 8, 2010 at 7:07 PM
Lawn Order said...: I agree, and am the one who posted that. If he has suffered brain injury due to his accident, he gets a little slack.

I have not seen any studies showing this sort of injury causing or predisposing one to a white supremacist viewpoint. Or, for that matter of causing someone to fall in love with an incompetent, publicity-seeking, sadistic politician. However, that sort of injury demonstrably causes lack of critical thinking ability in some patients, uncontrolled anger in some. In other sufferers it can predispose one to increased susceptibility to being unduly impressionable, and the list is lengthy.

Mark - are you currently seeking/undergoing treatment?; February 8, 2010 at 7:41 PM
Liz F - North Phoenix said...: LawN Order -

LOL!

You're right! " I have not seen any studies showing this sort of injury causing or predisposing one to a white supremacist viewpoint."

I hadn't looked at it that way.

Now, this is scarey: "Or, for that matter of causing someone to fall in love with an incompetent, publicity-seeking, sadistic politician."

You have an ability to see the true Mark.

ROTFL! Are you Markie's neighbor? If so, can you tell his Mommy and Daddy that he's up using the computer well after his bed time?; February 8, 2010 at 7:55 PM
A White Guy said...: Demagogues exist thanks, in large part, to people of Mark Gasser's mentality. "Mentality" is used advisedly in the preceding sentence.

As the core of the earth, and everything upon it, this is over Mark's head.

Explanation: That means- Mark you won't get it. I wish I could help.

Oops- I just realized something. Milk is white, very very white. Mark, is that the last thing you remember?; February 8, 2010 at 7:56 PM
A White Guy said...: Mark Gasser, you disappoint! Aren't you going to accuse me of being paid to be white?

You've stupidly accused educated people who have read about Arpaio and his malfeasance in office of being paid to post their views. I don't see why you would except my white skin.

Mark, I know it's not nice to laugh at others, but sometimes as in your case, it's simply unavoidable!; February 8, 2010 at 8:18 PM
Anonymous said...: Just saw the Arpaio press conference. Man! The old guy looks like hell! Must be all of those sleepless nights waiting up late, thinking about the impending Federal indictment for abuse of power!; February 8, 2010 at 8:52 PM
Lawn Order said...: MCSO in action- does anyone (Mark Gasser) care to say this isn't factual?

ExcerptedFrom The Arizona Republic Feb. 8, 2010 10:07 PM

A convicted child rapist who escaped from the Maricopa County Courthouse last year was reportedly captured Monday afternoon in Mexico, according to the U.S. Marshals Service.

....

The former ice-cream truck driver was convicted in 2005 of sexually assaulting his girlfriend's 9-year-old daughter and sentenced to life in prison with no chance of parole for 35 years.

But last year he was back in court to stand trial for two unrelated rapes. On Feb. 17, he slipped out of handcuffs during a lunchtime break and evaded the Maricopa County Sheriff's deputies who were supposed to be guarding him. His escape was captured by cameras as he walked unchallenged out of the downtown Phoenix court complex.

------------

Sure does make you feel safe, no?

But at least the good citizens of Maricopa County have another Arpaio reality show to plug before he goes on trial in court "Police Women of Maricopa County". Ya' think Arpiao will find a way to get his mug on TV? That's a rhetorical question, of course. The real question: Will he do it in drag?; February 8, 2010 at 11:09 PM
Lawn Order said...: Mark Gasser: You who seem to know all, but having never learned much, may I ask?

Why do toupee-clad bald guys always appear to need a haircut?

Is it the "money ran (sic) system"? Too much Rogaine employed in hair farming? Just what is the deal with that?; February 8, 2010 at 11:41 PM
Mark Gasser said...: To all who say baby crap words about me. Joe is going to win another term. The Feds are going to lose. Joe is getting other sheriffs to arrest the modern day slaves and meth backs. Soon, their won't be anymore illegal Latinos, meth backs and modern day slaves in MY country. MARK my words.

Boo Woo, don't cry, maybe one day the monsters will die in your head, maybe.; February 9, 2010 at 2:15 AM
Anonymous said...: SOUNDS LIKE YOU PEOPLE DON'T LIKE HEARING THE TRUTH, JOE HAS DONE A EXCELLENT JOB & WILL DO AN EXCELLENT JOB & WILL KEEP DOING AN EXCELLENT JOB BECAUSE HE HAS AZ. PEOPLE BEHIND HIM!!!!!!!; February 9, 2010 at 6:00 AM
Anonymous said...: YOU PROGRESSIVES LOVE NAMECALL ETC. REMEMBER, IF YOUR ACCUSING, YOUR ACTUALLY THE QUILTY ONE, BY THE WAY THIS IS NOT ANYONE, I'M A PROUD AMERICAN THAT WILL HELP CHANGE THE PROGRESSIVE AGENDA. AND YES I USE CAPS SO PEOPLE CAN READ....; February 9, 2010 at 6:08 AM
Anonymous said...: Hey Caps boy, you are such a moron! You think Sheriff Joke is doing a good job? Take a look at how he has wasted millions of dollars in County money, is still continuing to wast tax payers money with his own ridiculous lawsuits that has no bearing to them? If you think he is doing a good job, I suggest you get your head out of your ass you old fart. I am assuming you are old because 39 percent of the people who think he is doing a good job are in the old farts category, (65 and up) while the rest of us thinks he is doing a poor job. Joke needs to be out of office and be forced to repay the millions of dollars he wasted in tax payer money or go to jail!; February 9, 2010 at 7:42 AM
Anonymous said...: LIKE YOU....THAT DON'T MAKE NO SENSE WHEN IT COMES TO THE WORD ILLEGAL...GOT SOMETHING TO HIDE??????; February 9, 2010 at 7:43 AM
Anonymous said...: HE HAS NOT WASTED ANY OF OUR TAX DOLLARS DOING HIS JOB TO BENEFIT US TAX PAYERS. YOU MIGHT WANT TO ADMIT THE WASTING OF TAX DOLLARS THANKS TO OUR CORRUPT PROGRESSIVE GOVERNMENT, YOU FOOL!; February 9, 2010 at 7:46 AM
Lawn Order said...: So, nobody cares to dispute the facts from the AZ Republic? And you still say he's saving taxpayer money? Manhunts are free, if Joe let's 'em go, and the Feds return them? Sorry, most people won't see logic there, it's their money wasted!

Again:

Excerpted From The Arizona Republic Feb. 8, 2010 10:07 PM

A convicted child rapist who escaped from the Maricopa County Courthouse last year was reportedly captured Monday afternoon in Mexico, according to the U.S. Marshals Service.

....

The former ice-cream truck driver was convicted in 2005 of sexually assaulting his girlfriend's 9-year-old daughter and sentenced to life in prison with no chance of parole for 35 years.

But last year he was back in court to stand trial for two unrelated rapes. On Feb. 17, he slipped out of handcuffs during a lunchtime break and evaded the Maricopa County Sheriff's deputies who were supposed to be guarding him. His escape was captured by cameras as he walked unchallenged out of the downtown Phoenix court complex.; February 9, 2010 at 10:44 AM
Lawn Order said...: I should've said: "it's our money (that's) wasted!"; February 9, 2010 at 10:45 AM
Anonymous said...: Our money has been wasted on alot of many other less important things, although if if are able to read&comprehend what was stated...tax payers money IS NOT wasted on joe doing his job! Now, the progressives want to do less for the tax payers, taking police off our streets, safety is the last thing on their mind. their agenda stinks from day one. Progressive=disaster=no sense....; February 9, 2010 at 10:59 AM
Anonymous said...: Some of the people actually believe in most of our corrupt media. Do they back up there story with TRUE evidence? NOT, We all need to educate ourselves to know what's true verses not.; February 9, 2010 at 11:05 AM
Anonymous said...: Whatever- this blog is about Arpaio and MCSO.
By efinition, on the seemingly rare occasions when Joe is doing his job competently, he's not wasting tax monies. The point being, that he mostly does what he wants, and keeps very poor records of it. (Note the title of his book: "Joe's Law..." Tell you anything?

This blog is not about which politcal movement is wrong. Are any right, really? Look around, have things improved in your lifetime, even during your parents' lifetimes?; February 9, 2010 at 11:08 AM
Anonymous said...: So it's up to the people to improve the corrupt system. This blog is about the government doing wrong! Joe does his job by the laws, so why so many protesters? Because they side with breaking laws?; February 9, 2010 at 11:52 AM
Anonymous said...: Is the system getting more or less corrupt in your opinion. In the opinion of many Arpaio is a publicity hound, who fails. There are plenty of fact to back that up. I will cite an earlier post:

The Wikipedia article on "Joe Arpiao", read the 5-part Pulitzer-nominated East Valley Tribune series on MCSO, and the Goldwater Institute report on MCSO.

Have you read any of those? Do you have any countervailing facts for which you can provide source references?; February 9, 2010 at 12:09 PM
Anonymous said...: Video of white supremacist neo-nazis supporting Arpaio. Does anyone recognize Mark Gasser or JW Simms?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DqH_unPs8SQ

And, no I am not pro-illegal anything, including immigration. So come up with something rational or just keep it zipped. Just thought some might be interested in seeing one of Arpaio's blocs of support. Does anyone know whether he's ever denounced this sort of thing? I do not- never heard he had. I hope that he has though.; February 9, 2010 at 12:57 PM
Anonymous said...: What would be the benefit to tell a lie? Ask the media, which caters to the corruption of Washington...The agenda is clear, what's right is right/what's wrong is wrong & we need to make it right.; February 9, 2010 at 2:09 PM
Anonymous said...: "What would be the benefit to tell a lie? Ask the media, which caters to the corruption of Washington."

I sort-of agree. But they are in business to sell ads, make money (and serve the public if that happens to be possible after the first two criteria are met). Arpaio is good for the media business. Witness his numerous TV appearances, his "reality" shows, his mugging for the camera at every opportunity.

Is he good at law enforcement? The available facts don't affirm that he is.; February 9, 2010 at 3:26 PM
Anonymous said...: He's proven time & time again to legally do his job, been voted in by the citizens of az. He still does a good job, even though progressives are taking away top priorties of our state, like boarder control agents, police officers...It would be alot easier & less money if we send illegals/terrorists back the way they came, close the boarders.; February 9, 2010 at 4:41 PM
Anonymous said...: Again, the american legal citizen should have more rights than an illegal, that sure makes sense to alot of folks that voted Joe in many times. Using strict laws will help in achievement, that's what's needed & by law abiding Joe.; February 9, 2010 at 4:54 PM
Anonymous said...: Nobody disputes that Arpaio is a legal citizen. It's just that he's supposed to be doing his whole job, and accurately documenting it. He's not supposed to be selling TV advertising or self-titled books that he claims not to have read. Why does the title begin "Joe's Law..."? Whose law do you think he's enforcing? He accidentally ("Freudian slips" are in print sometimes) admitted it in that book title.; February 9, 2010 at 5:03 PM
Anonymous said...: "Again, the american legal citizen should have more rights" - but nice (lame) attempt at a "straw man" (look it up here: http://www.nizkor.org/features/fallacies/). Try to find a fallacy that your favorite politician (and legal citizen) hasn't employed. Tell me if you do!; February 9, 2010 at 5:42 PM
Anonymous said...: Illegals need to be detered, bottom line, Joe is one who will kick azz & take names...so what are you afraid of?; February 9, 2010 at 5:54 PM
Anonymous said...: Of course him doing his job, He seems to abide by the law, not illegals.; February 9, 2010 at 8:21 PM
Anonymous said...: Are you accusing me, the guy who posted (and posts) verifiable, documented facts of being afraid? Another lame attempt at diversion. I'm a white, law-abiding citizen. I try to help my neighbors.

Where are the (documented- look it up) facts supporting your support of Arpaio?

Some examples for you:

ExcerptedFrom The Arizona Republic Feb. 8, 2010 10:07 PM

A convicted child rapist who escaped from the Maricopa County Courthouse last year was reportedly captured Monday afternoon in Mexico, according to the U.S. Marshals Service.

....

The former ice-cream truck driver was convicted in 2005 of sexually assaulting his girlfriend's 9-year-old daughter and sentenced to life in prison with no chance of parole for 35 years.

But last year he was back in court to stand trial for two unrelated rapes. On Feb. 17, he slipped out of handcuffs during a lunchtime break and evaded the Maricopa County Sheriff's deputies who were supposed to be guarding him. His escape was captured by cameras as he walked unchallenged out of the downtown Phoenix court complex.

Also you can look up the following:
The Wikipedia article on "Joe Arpiao"; the 5-part Pulitzer nominated East Valley Tribune series on MCSO; and the Goldwater Institute report on MCSO.

And rather than accusing those who post such facts of some sort of emotional, ethnic, or any other sort of bias: If your position in support of the (current) Sheriff is well-founded, post the documentation of that as I do. You are either tragically uninformed, or untruthful. In either case, your thinking is tragic. That's provable (and will be in court, by the way).

The ad hominem attacks, are transparently desperate! You can look that up on the fallacies web page I posted earlier. But you won't, because the facts (what the dictionary defines those as) do not matter to idealogues, pedagogues, demagogues and hamsters. It matters not to me how you categorize yourself.; February 9, 2010 at 10:18 PM
Anonymous said...: That shows how nieve you are getting facts from typical progressive media!; February 10, 2010 at 5:53 AM
Mark Gasser said...: Lol, still pushing the goldwater piss report lol again. Sure, read some twisted facts if you want to be brain washed. Get a life goldwater piss cheer leader bitch boy. Boy is a nice term for someone as ignorant as you, I think child is much more fitting? The majority agrees for sure.; February 10, 2010 at 8:32 AM
Anonymous said...: The true fact is az. has believed in Joe for many years, now the corrupt feds trying to thug him for their progressive agenda. az. don't want to be mexico again....; February 10, 2010 at 4:34 PM
Anonymous said...: BEING IGNORANT DOES'NT WORK!; February 10, 2010 at 5:35 PM

Tuesday, February 2, 2010

208 Comments:

Post a Comment

Previous Posts